mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Robustness In Sparse Autoencoders via Masked Regularization

arXiv 2604.06495 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used in mechanistic interpretability to project LLM activations onto sparse latent spaces. However, sparsity alone is an imperfect proxy for interpretability, and current training objectives often result in brittle latent representations. SAEs are known to be prone to feature absorption, where general features are subsumed by more specific ones due to co-occurrence, degrading interpretability despite high reconstruction fidelity. Recent negative results on Out-of-Distribution (OOD) performance further underscore broader robustness related failures tied to under-specified training objectives. We address this by proposing a masking-based regularization that randomly replaces tokens during training to disrupt co-occurrence patterns. This improves robustness across SAE architectures and sparsity levels reducing absorption, enhancing probing performance, and narrowing the OOD gap. Our results point toward a practical path for more reliable interpretability tools.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 14 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

Builds on

14 of 19 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoders21 Mar
  2. 2025Transcoders Beat Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability31 Jan
  3. 2022Toy Models of Superposition21 Sep

Other references · 11

  1. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  2. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  3. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  4. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  5. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  6. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 300
  7. 2022Matryoshka Representation Learningcited by 282
  8. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
  9. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 130
  10. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 124
  11. 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 115

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Analysis of Variational Sparse Autoencoders
  2. 2025SplInterp: Improving our Understanding and Training of Sparse Autoencoders
  3. 2026Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders: Do SAEs Beat Random Baselines?
  4. 2026Beyond the Hard Budget: Sparsity Regularizers for More Interpretable Top-k Sparse Autoencoders
  5. 2025Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random Transformers
  6. 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?
  7. 2024Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Targeted Concept Erasure Tasks
  8. 2025Sparse Autoencoders, Again?