Attribution-Guided Distillation of Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) aim to disentangle model activations into monosemantic, human-interpretable features. In practice, learned features are often redundant and vary across training runs and sparsity levels, which makes interpretations difficult to transfer and reuse. We introduce Distilled Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoders (DMSAEs), a training pipeline that distills a compact core of consistently useful features and reuses it to train new SAEs. DMSAEs run an iterative distillation cycle: train a Matryoshka SAE with a shared core, use gradient X activation to measure each feature's contribution to next-token loss in the most nested reconstruction, and keep only the smallest subset that explains a fixed fraction of the attribution. Only the core encoder weight vectors are transferred across cycles; the core decoder and all non-core latents are reinitialized each time. On Gemma-2-2B layer 12 residual stream activations, seven cycles of distillation (500M tokens, 65k width) yielded a distilled core of 197 features that were repeatedly selected. Training using this distilled core improves several SAEBench metrics and demonstrates that consistent sets of latent features can be transferred across sparsity levels
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2025.
Builds on
10 of 19 references.
References · 10
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 412
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 148
- 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 136
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 118
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Featurescited by 86
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 80
- 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 43
- 2024Relational Composition in Neural Networks: A Survey and Call to Actioncited by 23
- 2025Position: Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in SAEscited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026From Atoms to Trees: Building a Structured Feature Forest with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 6
- 2026Stable and Steerable Sparse Autoencoders with Weight Regularizationcited by 5
- 2026Perplexity Can Miss SAE Feature Damage Under Quantizationcited by 4
- 2026Feature Starvation as Geometric Instability in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026Perplexity Can Miss SAE Feature Damage Under Quantization2 Jun 2026
- 2026Feature Starvation as Geometric Instability in Sparse Autoencoders6 May 2026
- 2026Stable and Steerable Sparse Autoencoders with Weight Regularization4 Mar 2026
- 2026From Atoms to Trees: Building a Structured Feature Forest with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoders12 Feb 2026