Parallel Test-Time Scaling with Multi-Sequence Verifiers
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Parallel test-time scaling, which generates multiple candidate solutions for a single problem, is a powerful technique for improving large language model performance. However, it is hindered by two key bottlenecks: accurately selecting the correct solution from the candidate pool, and the high inference latency from generating many full solutions. We argue that both challenges are fundamentally linked to verifier calibration, as a well-calibrated verifier improves answer selection and enables early-stopping strategies to reduce latency. However, existing non-generative verifiers are limited as they score each candidate in isolation, overlooking rich contextual information across the set of candidates. To address this, we introduce the Multi-Sequence Verifier (MSV), a lightweight verifier that predicts each candidate's correctness conditioned on the full sampled set. MSV achieves improved calibration, which directly enhances best-of-N selection performance and empowers a novel early-stopping framework. Across challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks, MSV improves best-of-64 accuracy by up to 6% relative to strong baselines, and in the early-stopping setting reaches the same accuracy as baselines with less than half the latency.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 36 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
36 of 45 references.
Closest ancestors · 11
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Deep Think with Confidence21 Aug
- 2025GenSelect: A Generative Approach to Best-of-N23 Jul
- 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models22 Apr
- 2025Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification7 Apr
- 2025Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Self-Calibration25 Feb
- 2025Can 1B LLM Surpass 405B LLM? Rethinking Compute-Optimal Test-Time Scaling10 Feb
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
- 2024Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoning19 Jan
- 2023Universal Self-Consistency for Large Language Model Generation29 Nov
- 2023Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs19 May
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know11 Jul
Other references · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
13 more
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
- 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 465
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
- 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 277
- 2025DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoningcited by 261
- 2024Transformers need glasses! Information over-squashing in language taskscited by 87
- 2024Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistencycited by 72
- 2023When Does Optimizing a Proper Loss Yield Calibration?cited by 35
- 2025Hogwild! Inference: Parallel LLM Generation via Concurrent Attentioncited by 32
- 2023Counting and Algorithmic Generalization with Transformerscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Trust but Verify! A Survey on Verification Design for Test-time Scaling
- 2025Continuous Self-Improvement of Large Language Models by Test-time Training with Verifier-Driven Sample Selection
- 2025Multi-Agent Verification: Scaling Test-Time Compute with Multiple Verifiers
- 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
- 2025Scaling Flaws of Verifier-Guided Search in Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025First Finish Search: Efficient Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models
- 2026Refining Over Resampling: Test-Time Self-Correction for LLM Reasoning
- 2025Critique to Verify: Accurate and Honest Test-Time Scaling with RL-Trained Verifiers