Same Error, Different Function: The Optimizer as an Implicit Prior in Financial Time Series
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks applied to financial time series operate in a regime of underspecification, where model predictors achieve indistinguishable out-of-sample error. Using large-scale volatility forecasting for S&P 500 stocks, we show that different model-training-pipeline pairs with identical test loss learn qualitatively different functions. Across architectures, predictive accuracy remains unchanged, yet optimizer choice reshapes non-linear response profiles and temporal dependence differently. These divergences have material consequences for decisions: volatility-ranked portfolios trace a near-vertical Sharpe-turnover frontier, with nearly 3× turnover dispersion at comparable Sharpe ratios. We conclude that in underspecified settings, optimization acts as a consequential source of inductive bias, thus model evaluation should extend beyond scalar loss to encompass functional and decision-level implications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 114 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
65 of 114 references.
References · 65
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
38 more
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
- 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 650
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2023One Fits All:Power General Time Series Analysis by Pretrained LMcited by 615
- 2024Unified Training of Universal Time Series Forecasting Transformerscited by 588
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
- 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
- 2020Time Series Forecasting With Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 457
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
- 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
- 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 364
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
- 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 259
- 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
- 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
- 2024Foundation Models for Time Series Analysis: A Tutorial and Surveycited by 234
- 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
- 2021On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 183
- 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 162
- 2022Self-Stabilization: The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 151
- 2020The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networkscited by 149
- 2024Why Transformers Need Adam: A Hessian Perspectivecited by 123
- 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 88
- 2019On the Existence of Simpler Machine Learning Modelscited by 87
- 2018On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Lengthcited by 85
- 2022Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Treescited by 80
- 2024Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language Modelscited by 78
- 2024Understanding Optimization in Deep Learning with Central Flowscited by 57
- 2024Amazing Things Come From Having Many Good Modelscited by 52
- 2021Understanding the Generalization of Adam in Learning Neural Networks with Proper Regularizationcited by 48
- 2019Deep Learning in Asset Pricingcited by 41
- 2024Deconstructing What Makes a Good Optimizer for Language Modelscited by 40
- 2022Beyond the Edge of Stability via Two-step Gradient Updatescited by 38
- 2021Fast Sparse Decision Tree Optimization via Reference Ensemblescited by 37
- 2023A Path to Simpler Models Starts With Noisecited by 33
50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.