Rich Insights from Cheap Signals: Efficient Evaluations via Tensor Factorization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Moving beyond evaluations that collapse performance across heterogeneous prompts toward fine-grained evaluation at the prompt level, or within relatively homogeneous subsets, is necessary to diagnose generative models' strengths and weaknesses. Such fine-grained evaluations, however, suffer from a data bottleneck: human gold-standard labels are too costly at this scale, while automated ratings are often misaligned with human judgment. To resolve this challenge, we propose a novel statistical model based on tensor factorization that merges cheap autorater data with a limited set of human gold-standard labels. Specifically, our approach uses autorater scores to pretrain latent representations of prompts and generative models, and then aligns those pretrained representations to human preferences using a small calibration set. This sample-efficient methodology is robust to autorater quality, more accurately predicts human preferences on a per-prompt basis than standard baselines, and provides tight confidence intervals for key statistical parameters of interest. We also showcase the practical utility of our method by constructing granular leaderboards based on prompt qualities and by estimating model performance solely from autorater scores, eliminating the need for additional human annotations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.
Builds on
35 of 52 references.
References · 35
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 480
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
- 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmarkcited by 362
- 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 354
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 295
23 more
- 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 197
- 2024OffsetBias: Leveraging Debiased Data for Tuning Evaluatorscited by 94
- 2024The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Modelscited by 89
- 2023Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examplescited by 84
- 2021Active Testing: Sample-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 82
- 2024Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMscited by 72
- 2023Efficient Benchmarking of Language Modelscited by 71
- 2024AutoEval Done Right: Using Synthetic Data for Model Evaluationcited by 53
- 2024Revisiting Text-to-Image Evaluation with Gecko: On Metrics, Prompts, and Human Ratingscited by 44
- 2025Lost in Benchmarks? Rethinking Large Language Model Benchmarking with Item Response Theorycited by 42
- 2025IRT-Router: Effective and Interpretable Multi-LLM Routing via Item Response Theorycited by 40
- 2023Position: AI Evaluation Should Learn from How We Test Humanscited by 36
- 2023Revealing the structure of language model capabilitiescited by 35
- 2025CARROT: A Cost Aware Rate Optimal Routercited by 34
- 2025Prompt-to-Leaderboardcited by 27
- 2025How Benchmark Prediction from Fewer Data Misses the Markcited by 26
- 2018Learning from Binary Multiway Data: Probabilistic Tensor Decomposition and its Statistical Optimalitycited by 15
- 2025Cost-Optimal Active AI Model Evaluationcited by 14
- 2025Scaling Up Active Testing to Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2024Long-Span Question-Answering: Automatic Question Generation and QA-System Ranking via Side-by-Side Evaluationcited by 8
- 2024Survey of Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Machine Learning Perspectivecited by 6
- 2025Bridging Human and LLM Judgments: Understanding and Narrowing the Gapcited by 6
- 2025Beyond Benchmarking: Scenario-Based Evaluation of Large Language Models for Personalized Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.