mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revealing the structure of language model capabilities

arXiv 2306.10062 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 40

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Building a theoretical understanding of the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) is vital for our ability to predict and explain the behavior of these systems. Here, we investigate the structure of LLM capabilities by extracting latent capabilities from patterns of individual differences across a varied population of LLMs. Using a combination of Bayesian and frequentist factor analysis, we analyzed data from 29 different LLMs across 27 cognitive tasks. We found evidence that LLM capabilities are not monolithic. Instead, they are better explained by three well-delineated factors that represent reasoning, comprehension and core language modeling. Moreover, we found that these three factors can explain a high proportion of the variance in model performance. These results reveal a consistent structure in the capabilities of different LLMs and demonstrate the multifaceted nature of these capabilities. We also found that the three abilities show different relationships to model properties such as model size and instruction tuning. These patterns help refine our understanding of scaling laws and indicate that changes to a model that improve one ability might simultaneously impair others. Based on these findings, we suggest that benchmarks could be streamlined by focusing on tasks that tap into each broad model ability.

Key facts. Cited by 40 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2023.

Builds on

11 of 35 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  4. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  5. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  6. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  7. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  8. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
  9. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  10. 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
  11. 2020Transformers as Soft Reasoners over Languagecited by 270

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 9; 2025: 6; 2026: 22.

40 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performancecited by 130
  2. 2025Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarkscited by 119
  3. 2024Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models by Meta Probing Agentscited by 54
  4. 2024LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Docited by 32
  5. 2024100 instances is all you need: predicting the success of a new LLM on unseen data by testing on a few instancescited by 24
  6. 2024Sloth: scaling laws for LLM skills to predict multi-benchmark performance across familiescited by 24
  7. 2023Evaluating General-Purpose AI with Psychometricscited by 23
  8. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometricscited by 22
  9. 2024Beyond Human Norms: Unveiling Unique Values of Large Language Models through Interdisciplinary Approachescited by 14
  10. 2025Train-before-Test Harmonizes Language Model Rankingscited by 12
  11. 2023Language Models as a Service: Overview of a New Paradigm and its Challengescited by 10
  12. 2026What do Language Models Learn and When? The Implicit Curriculum Hypothesiscited by 10
28 more
  1. 2025From Benchmarks to Skills: Low-Rank Factors for LLM Evaluationcited by 9
  2. 2024When Reasoning Meets Information Aggregation: A Case Study with Sports Narrativescited by 7
  3. 2026Capabilities Ain't All You Need: Measuring Propensities in AIcited by 6
  4. 2024Comprehensive Reassessment of Large-Scale Evaluation Outcomes in LLMs: A Multifaceted Statistical Approachcited by 5
  5. 2026A Neuropsychologically Grounded Evaluation of LLM Cognitive Abilitiescited by 5
  6. 2023Rescue: Ranking LLM Responses with Partial Ordering to Improve Response Generationcited by 4
  7. 2025Psychometric Personality Shaping Modulates Capabilities and Safety in Language Modelscited by 4
  8. 2026BenchScope: How Many Independent Signals Does Your Benchmark Provide?cited by 3
  9. 2026AI Cartography: Mapping the Latent Landscape of AI Benchmark Ecosystemscited by 3
  10. 2026You Don't Need to Run Every Evalcited by 3
  11. 2025RefuteBench 2.0 -- Agentic Benchmark for Dynamic Evaluation of LLM Responses to Refutation Instructioncited by 2
  12. 2025A Latent Variable Framework for Scaling Laws in Large Language Modelscited by 2
  13. 2026Rich Insights from Cheap Signals: Efficient Evaluations via Tensor Factorizationcited by 2
  14. 2026Cost-Efficient Estimation of General Abilities Across Benchmarkscited by 2
  15. 2026From Human-Level AI Tales to AI Leveling Human Scalescited by 1
  16. 2026Pressure Reveals Character: Behavioural Alignment Evaluation at Depthcited by 1
  17. 2026SuperValid: Capability-Aligned OOD Validation for Generalizable Downstream Scalingcited by 1
  18. 2026Harbor Adapters and Harbor-Index: Infrastructure and a Curated Meta-Dataset for Large-Scale Agentic Evaluationcited by 1
  19. 2026Dynamic LLM Routers are Often Misguidedcited by 1
  20. 2026Growing Pains: Extensible and Efficient LLM Benchmarking Via Fixed Parameter Calibrationcited by 0
  21. 2026LLMs Show No Signs Of Individuated Metacognitioncited by 0
  22. 2026Predicting Inference-Time Scaling Gains from Labeled Validation-Set Output Statisticscited by 0
  23. 2026The Evaluation Blind Spot: A Stereological Theory of Benchmark Coverage for Large Language Modelscited by 0
  24. 2026Will Scaling Improve Social Simulation with LLMs?cited by 0
  25. 2026A Statistical Audit of Physical AI Benchmark Redundancycited by 0
  26. 2026One Capability or Many? Structural and Predictive Tests of Benchmark Validity Disagree About Economic Benchmarks for Frontier AIcited by 0
  27. 2026Accounting for Bias Enables Sustainable LLM Evaluationcited by 0
  28. 2026Large-scale factor analysis shows machine intelligence is only partially interpretablecited by 0