mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Physical Evaluation of Naturalistic Adversarial Patches for Camera-Based Traffic-Sign Detection

arXiv 2603.00217 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper studies how well Naturalistic Adversarial Patches (NAPs) transfer to a physical traffic sign setting when the detector is trained on a customized dataset for an autonomous vehicle (AV) environment. We construct a composite dataset, CompGTSRB (which is customized dataset for AV environment), by pasting traffic sign instances from the German Traffic Sign Recognition Benchmark (GTSRB) onto undistorted backgrounds captured from the target platform. CompGTSRB is used to train a YOLOv5 model and generate patches using a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) with latent space optimization, following existing NAP methods. We carried out a series of experiments on our Quanser QCar testbed utilizing the front CSI camera provided in QCar. Across configurations, NAPs reduce the detector's STOP class confidence. Different configurations include distance, patch sizes, and patch placement. These results along with a detailed step-by-step methodology indicate the utility of CompGTSRB dataset and the proposed systematic physical protocols for credible patch evaluation. The research further motivate researching the defenses that address localized patch corruption in embedded perception pipelines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2026.

Builds on

9 of 17 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  2. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  3. 2020Unsupervised Discovery of Interpretable Directions in the GAN Latent Spacecited by 288
  4. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  5. 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
  6. 2023Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion Attackcited by 37
  7. 2024PAD: Patch-Agnostic Defense against Adversarial Patch Attackscited by 31
  8. 2022Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition Systemscited by 27
  9. 2022REAP: A Large-Scale Realistic Adversarial Patch Benchmarkcited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.