mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tokenization, Fusion and Decoupling: Bridging the Granularity Mismatch Between Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs

arXiv 2602.22698 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC) is promising but hindered by a fundamental granularity mismatch. LLMs operate on fragmented token sequences, whereas entities are the fundamental units in knowledge graphs (KGs) scenarios. Existing approaches typically constrain predictions to limited candidate sets or align entities with the LLM's vocabulary by pooling multiple tokens or decomposing entities into fixed-length token sequences, which fail to capture both the semantic meaning of the text and the structural integrity of the graph. To address this, we propose KGT, a novel framework that uses dedicated entity tokens to enable efficient, full-space prediction. Specifically, we first introduce specialized tokenization to construct feature representations at the level of dedicated entity tokens. We then fuse pre-trained structural and textual features into these unified embeddings via a relation-guided gating mechanism, avoiding training from scratch. Finally, we implement decoupled prediction by leveraging independent heads to separate and combine semantic and structural reasoning. Experimental results show that KGT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple benchmarks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.

Builds on

23 of 39 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  2. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
  3. 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 935
  4. 2014Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Basescited by 929
  5. 2019RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Spacecited by 893
  6. 2017Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 729
  7. 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
  8. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
  9. 2019KG-BERT: BERT for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 323
  10. 2019TuckER: Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 290
  11. 2023Think-on-Graph: Deep and Responsible Reasoning of Large Language Model on Knowledge Graphcited by 235
  12. 2019MMKG: Multi-Modal Knowledge Graphscited by 104
11 more
  1. 2016Image-embodied Knowledge Representation Learningcited by 68
  2. 2020Inductive Entity Representations from Text via Link Predictioncited by 61
  3. 2023Dipping PLMs Sauce: Bridging Structure and Text for Effective Knowledge Graph Completion via Conditional Soft Promptingcited by 33
  4. 2023IMF: Interactive Multimodal Fusion Model for Link Predictioncited by 28
  5. 2024MKGL: Mastery of a Three-Word Languagecited by 17
  6. 2024Breaking the Barrier: Utilizing Large Language Models for Industrial Recommendation Systems through an Inferential Knowledge Graphcited by 16
  7. 2024KG-FIT: Knowledge Graph Fine-Tuning Upon Open-World Knowledgecited by 16
  8. 2022I Know What You Do Not Know: Knowledge Graph Embedding via Co-distillation Learningcited by 15
  9. 2024Tokenization, Fusion, and Augmentation: Towards Fine-grained Multi-modal Entity Representationcited by 14
  10. 2024Multiple Heads are Better than One: Mixture of Modality Knowledge Experts for Entity Representation Learningcited by 13
  11. 2023Towards Faithful Knowledge Graph Explanation Through Deep Alignment in Commonsense Question Answeringcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.