mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Headless Firm: How AI Reshapes Enterprise Boundaries

arXiv 2602.21401 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2026cs.GT cs.AI cs.SIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The boundary of the firm is determined by coordination cost. We argue that agentic AI induces a structural change in how coordination costs scale: in prior modular systems, integration cost grew with interaction topology (O(n^2) in the number of components); in protocol-mediated agentic systems, integration cost collapses to O(n) while verification scales with task throughput rather than interaction count. This shift selects for a specific organizational equilibrium -- the Headless Firm -- structured as an hourglass: a personalized generative interface at the top, a standardized protocol waist in the middle, and a competitive market of micro-specialized execution agents at the bottom. We formalize this claim as a coordination cost model with two falsifiable empirical predictions: (1) the marginal cost of adding an execution provider should be approximately constant in a mature hourglass ecosystem; (2) the ratio of total coordination cost to task throughput should remain stable as ecosystem size grows. We derive conditions for hourglass stability versus re-centralization and analyze implications for firm size distributions, labor markets, and software economics. The analysis predicts a domain-conditional Great Unbundling: in high knowledge-velocity domains, firm size distributions shift mass from large integrated incumbents toward micro-specialized agents and thin protocol orchestrators.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.

Builds on

15 of 87 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  2. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  3. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  4. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  5. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  6. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  7. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  8. 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,210
  9. 2024AIOS: LLM Agent Operating Systemcited by 94
  10. 2018Incomplete Contracting and AI Alignmentcited by 60
  11. 2024MoME: Mixture of Multimodal Experts for Generalist Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 45
  12. 2026Intelligent AI Delegationcited by 16
3 more
  1. 2025OpenApps: Simulating Environment Variations to Measure UI-Agent Reliabilitycited by 10
  2. 2025The GenUI Study: Exploring the Design of Generative UI Tools to Support UX Practitioners and Beyondcited by 9
  3. 2025Beyond Benchmarks: The Economics of AI Inferencecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Redrawing the AI Map: A Theory of Accountability Boundaries in Agentic Ecosystems
  2. 2026The Harness Effect: How Orchestration Design Sets the Token Economics of Enterprise Agentic AI
  3. 2026The CASE Framework: A Multi-Disciplinary Control Architecture for Governing Enterprise Agentic AI
  4. 2025The Agentic Economy
  5. 2026Real-Time AI Service Economy: A Framework for Agentic Computing Across the Continuum
  6. 2026The Buy-or-Build Decision, Revisited: How Agentic AI Changes the Economics of Enterprise Software ↗
  7. 2026Governing the Agentic Enterprise: A Governance Maturity Model for Managing AI Agent Sprawl in Business Operations
  8. 2024Beyond the Sum: Unlocking AI Agents Potential Through Market Forces