mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Real-Time AI Service Economy: A Framework for Agentic Computing Across the Continuum

arXiv 2603.05614 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous AI agents are becoming economic actors. They compose deadline-bound services across the device-edge-cloud continuum and contend for capacity no single operator owns. This article asks when decentralised pricing can coordinate them exactly and truthfully, and what their service dependencies must satisfy. We model the pipelines as service-dependency graphs under governance constraints and identify the decisive property: laminarity of the induced leaf-block family. Where it holds, the feasible allocation space is a polymatroid and efficient incentive-compatible clearing exists per epoch; where a crossing breaks it, exactness and truthfulness can fail, while clearing prices survive on every totally unimodular family. The formal results instantiate polymatroid, gross-substitutes and Vickrey-Clarke-Groves theory; the contribution is the bridge from dependency structure to that machinery and an integrator architecture that exposes a laminar interface. The node-level evaluation (32,020 runs), at testbed-calibrated congestion, locates the boundary. One crossing costs exactness in 14.7% of high-load rounds and none on laminar instances, and truthfulness fails where exactness does, across contention. An integrator's inner exposure restores exactness at a cost in admitted volume, and before translation overhead it cuts median latency by 16 to 17 percent. Against truth-free posted prices the tuned market leads at medium load and trails a demand-responsive one in four of six high-load cells. Recorded and composed agent workloads drive the allocation. For platform designers, laminar pipelines admit exact decentralised pricing, truthful under the VCG mechanism, and a crossing needs an integrator's inner exposure.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

7 of 69 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Socio-technical aspects of Agentic AI26 Dec
  2. 2025Agentic Services Computing29 Sep
  3. 2025Agentic AI Frameworks: Architectures, Protocols, and Design Challenges13 Aug
  4. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug

Other references · 3

  1. 2026Agents of Chaoscited by 24
  2. 2022Autonomy and Intelligence in the Computing Continuum: Challenges, Enablers, and Future Directions for Orchestrationcited by 12
  3. 2026Service Orchestration in the Computing Continuum: Structural Challenges and Visioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Beyond the Sum: Unlocking AI Agents Potential Through Market Forces
  2. 2026The Headless Firm: How AI Reshapes Enterprise Boundaries
  3. 2025The Cost of Dynamic Reasoning: Demystifying AI Agents and Test-Time Scaling from an AI Infrastructure Perspective
  4. 2026Token Economics for LLM Agents: A Dual-View Study from Computing and Economics
  5. 2026Infrastructure for the Agentic Web: Gap Analysis and Architecture from the Agentverse Platform
  6. 2025Efficient and Scalable Agentic AI with Heterogeneous Systems
  7. 2026Agentomics: Economic Foundations for the Valuation, Attribution, and Pricing of AI Agents in Human-AI Workflows
  8. 2026Architectural Implications of Agentic AI Workflows