Blackbird Language Matrices: A Framework to Investigate the Linguistic Competence of Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This article describes a novel language task, the Blackbird Language Matrices (BLM) task, inspired by intelligence tests, and illustrates the BLM datasets, their construction and benchmarking, and targeted experiments on chunking and systematicity. BLMs are multiple-choice problems, structured at multiple levels: within each sentence, across the input sequence, within each candidate answer. Because of their rich structure, these curated, but naturalistic datasets are key to answer some core questions about current large language models abilities: do LLMs detect linguistic objects and their properties? Do they detect and use systematic patterns across sentences? Are they more prone to linguistic or reasoning errors, and how do these interact? We show that BLMs, while challenging, can be solved at good levels of performance, in more than one language, with simple baseline models or, at better performance levels, with more tailored models. We show that their representations contain the grammatical objects and attributes relevant to solve a linguistic task. We also show that these solutions are reached by detecting systematic patterns across sentences. The paper supports the point of view that curated, structured datasets support multi-faceted investigations of properties of language and large language models. Because they present a curated, articulated structure, because they comprise both learning contexts and expected answers, and because they are partly built by hand, BLMs fall in the category of datasets that can support explainability investigations, and be useful to ask why large language models behave the way they do.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.
Builds on
48 of 87 references.
References · 48
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
- 2019CamemBERT: a Tasty French Language Modelcited by 368
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
36 more
- 2024Do Llamas Work in English? On the Latent Language of Multilingual Transformerscited by 275
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
- 2022Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examplescited by 233
- 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 225
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
- 2022ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generationcited by 209
- 2022Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understandingcited by 199
- 2021Generating Datasets with Pretrained Language Modelscited by 192
- 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 165
- 2023Automatic Prompt Augmentation and Selection with Chain-of-Thought from Labeled Datacited by 119
- 2018Conditional BERT Contextual Augmentationcited by 107
- 2019Are Disentangled Representations Helpful for Abstract Visual Reasoning?cited by 100
- 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and reviewcited by 97
- 2019The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language modelscited by 92
- 2023Exploiting Asymmetry for Synthetic Training Data Generation: SynthIE and the Case of Information Extractioncited by 89
- 2025MultiBLiMP 1.0: A Massively Multilingual Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 65
- 2022Probing for the Usage of Grammatical Numbercited by 57
- 2020Syntax-guided Controlled Generation of Paraphrasescited by 47
- 2020DARE: Data Augmented Relation Extraction with GPT-2cited by 43
- 2020Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humanscited by 42
- 2022Deep Learning Methods for Abstract Visual Reasoning: A Survey on Raven's Progressive Matricescited by 37
- 2021Disentangled Sequence to Sequence Learning for Compositional Generalizationcited by 30
- 2024Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Modelscited by 26
- 2018Verb Argument Structure Alternations in Word and Sentence Embeddingscited by 25
- 2020Simulated Chats for Building Dialog Systems: Learning to Generate Conversations from Instructionscited by 25
- 2020Syntactic Search by Examplecited by 20
- 2021On the Limits of Minimal Pairs in Contrastive Evaluationcited by 15
- 2024How to Make the Most of LLMs' Grammatical Knowledge for Acceptability Judgmentscited by 14
- 2025LLMs as a synthesis between symbolic and distributed approaches to languagecited by 13
- 2023Investigating semantic subspaces of Transformer sentence embeddings through linear structural probingcited by 12
- 2023Blackbird language matrices (BLM), a new task for rule-like generalization in neural networks: Motivations and Formal Specificationscited by 9
- 2024Are there identifiable structural parts in the sentence embedding whole?cited by 6
- 2024Tracking linguistic information in transformer-based sentence embeddings through targeted sparsificationcited by 6
- 2024Exploring syntactic information in sentence embeddings through multilingual subject-verb agreementcited by 6
- 2024Exploring Italian sentence embeddings properties through multi-taskingcited by 6
- 2024TARGA: Targeted Synthetic Data Generation for Practical Reasoning over Structured Datacited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.