Assessing the Reliability of Persona-Conditioned LLMs as Synthetic Survey Respondents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Using persona-conditioned LLMs as synthetic survey respondents has become a common practice in computational social science and agent-based simulations. Yet, it remains unclear whether multi-attribute persona prompting improves LLM reliability or instead introduces distortions. Here we contribute to this assessment by leveraging a large dataset of U.S. microdata from the World Values Survey. Concretely, we evaluate two open-weight chat models and a random-guesser baseline across more than 70K respondent-item instances. We find that persona prompting does not yield a clear aggregate improvement in survey alignment and, in many cases, significantly degrades performance. Persona effects are highly heterogeneous as most items exhibit minimal change, while a small subset of questions and underrepresented subgroups experience disproportionate distortions. Our findings highlight a key adverse impact of current persona-based simulation practices: demographic conditioning can redistribute error in ways that undermine subgroup fidelity and risk misleading downstream analyses.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.
Builds on
28 of 41 references.
References · 28
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 506
- 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 424
- 2023Large Language Models Empowered Agent-based Modeling and Simulation: A Survey and Perspectivescited by 253
- 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traitscited by 229
- 2023Bias Runs Deep: Implicit Reasoning Biases in Persona-Assigned LLMscited by 191
- 2024Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulationscited by 164
- 2022Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Valuescited by 147
- 2024Investigating Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 140
- 2024Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populationscited by 115
- 2024Large Language Models as Urban Residents: An LLM Agent Framework for Personal Mobility Generationcited by 99
- 2023CoMPosT: Characterizing and Evaluating Caricature in LLM Simulationscited by 94
16 more
- 2025Specializing Large Language Models to Simulate Survey Response Distributions for Global Populationscited by 50
- 2023AI-Augmented Surveys: Leveraging Large Language Models and Surveys for Opinion Predictioncited by 46
- 2024Y Social: an LLM-powered Social Media Digital Twincited by 43
- 2023Sociodemographic Prompting is Not Yet an Effective Approach for Simulating Subjective Judgments with LLMscited by 36
- 2023The Parrot Dilemma: Human-Labeled vs. LLM-augmented Data in Classification Taskscited by 35
- 2024Human and LLM Biases in Hate Speech Annotations: A Socio-Demographic Analysis of Annotators and Targetscited by 31
- 2025Population-Aligned Persona Generation for LLM-based Social Simulationcited by 20
- 2024Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2024Contextualized Counterspeech: Strategies for Adaptation, Personalization, and Evaluationcited by 15
- 2025Psychological Steering in LLMs: An Evaluation of Effectiveness and Trustworthinesscited by 7
- 2025Simulation of Language Evolution under Regulated Social Media Platforms: A Synergistic Approach of Large Language Models and Genetic Algorithmscited by 5
- 2025SimSpark: Interactive Simulation of Social Media Behaviorscited by 5
- 2024Evaluation of Reliability Criteria for News Publishers with Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025When Harry Meets Superman: The Role of The Interlocutor in Persona-Based Dialogue Generationcited by 4
- 2025Do Persona-Infused LLMs Affect Performance in a Strategic Reasoning Game?cited by 3
- 2025AlignSurvey: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Human Preferences Alignment in Social Surveyscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026When Can Digital Personas Reliably Approximate Human Survey Findings?cited by 2
- 2026Distribution-First Population Simulation: Collapse, Calibration, and Recall in Non-WEIRD LLM Persona Modelingcited by 1
- 2026Should LLM Agents Decide in Social Simulations? Comparing Finite-State and LLM-Based Decision Policiescited by 0
- 2026When Persona Simulations Are Informative: Graph-Structured Signals for Pluralistic Opinion Sensingcited by 0
- 2026Distributional Validity of a Korean Synthetic Persona Panel: Evidence From the Korea Media Panel Surveycited by 0
- 2026From Simulated Citizens to Simulated Deliberation: Challenges in Representation and Interactioncited by 0
- 2026Cultural Divergence Preservation: Diagnosing Flattening and Caricature in LLM-Simulated Survey Populationscited by 0
- 2026Cultural Divergence Preservation: Diagnosing Flattening and Caricature in LLM-Simulated Survey Populations24 Sep 2026
- 2026From Simulated Citizens to Simulated Deliberation: Challenges in Representation and Interaction7 Sep 2026
- 2026When Persona Simulations Are Informative: Graph-Structured Signals for Pluralistic Opinion Sensing23 Aug 2026
- 2026Distributional Validity of a Korean Synthetic Persona Panel: Evidence From the Korea Media Panel Survey23 Jul 2026
- 2026Distribution-First Population Simulation: Collapse, Calibration, and Recall in Non-WEIRD LLM Persona Modeling17 Jul 2026
- 2026Should LLM Agents Decide in Social Simulations? Comparing Finite-State and LLM-Based Decision Policies10 Jun 2026
- 2026When Can Digital Personas Reliably Approximate Human Survey Findings?11 May 2026