The Geometry of Noise: Why Diffusion Models Don't Need Noise Conditioning
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous (noise-agnostic) generative models, such as Equilibrium Matching and blind diffusion, challenge the standard paradigm by learning a single, time-invariant vector field that operates without explicit noise-level conditioning. While recent work suggests that high-dimensional concentration allows these models to implicitly estimate noise levels from corrupted observations, a fundamental paradox remains: what is the underlying landscape being optimized when the noise level is treated as a random variable, and how can a bounded, noise-agnostic network remain stable near the data manifold where gradients typically diverge? We resolve this paradox by formalizing Marginal Energy, Emarg(u) = -log p(u), where p(u) = int p(u|t)p(t)dt is the marginal density of the noisy data integrated over a prior distribution of unknown noise levels. We prove that generation using autonomous models is not merely blind denoising, but a specific form of Riemannian gradient flow on this Marginal Energy. Through a novel relative energy decomposition, we demonstrate that while the raw Marginal Energy landscape possesses a 1/tp singularity normal to the data manifold, the learned time-invariant field implicitly incorporates a local conformal metric that perfectly counteracts the geometric singularity, converting an infinitely deep potential well into a stable attractor. We also establish the structural stability conditions for sampling with autonomous models. We identify a ``Jensen Gap'' in noise-prediction parameterizations that acts as a high-gain amplifier for estimation errors, explaining the catastrophic failure observed in deterministic blind models. Conversely, we prove that velocity-based parameterizations are inherently stable because they satisfy a bounded-gain condition that absorbs posterior uncertainty into a smooth geometric drift.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.
Builds on
20 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Blind denoising diffusion models and the blessings of dimensionality10 Feb
- 2025Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models?18 Feb
- 2023Closed-Form Diffusion Models19 Oct
- 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models1 Jun
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis11 May
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models18 Feb
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations26 Nov
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models19 Jun
- 2020Improved Techniques for Training Score-Based Generative Models16 Jun
Other references · 11
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
- 2023Inversion by Direct Iteration: An Alternative to Denoising Diffusion for Image Restorationcited by 165
- 2020Improved Contrastive Divergence Training of Energy Based Modelscited by 130
- 2022Action Matching: Learning Stochastic Dynamics from Samplescited by 98
- 2025Equilibrium Matching: Generative Modeling with Implicit Energy-Based Modelscited by 21
- 2025Learning normalized image densities via dual score matchingcited by 18
- 2020One Size Fits All: Can We Train One Denoiser for All Noise Levels?cited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026What Time Is It? How Data Geometry Makes Time Conditioning Optional for Flow Matchingcited by 2
- 2026Beckmann Transport Models: From Autonomous Flows to One-Step Mapscited by 2
- 2026Generative Pseudo-Force Fields for Molecular Generationcited by 1
- 2026Equilibrium Forcing: Adaptive Video Generation Without Noise Conditioningcited by 1
- 2026Mean Mode Screaming: Mean--Variance Split Residuals for 1000-Layer Diffusion Transformerscited by 0
- 2026Condition-Wise Sinkhorn Drifting for One-Shot Learned Channel Simulationcited by 0
- 2026On the Redundancy of Timestep Embeddings in Diffusion Modelscited by 0
- 2026Does Uniform Discrete Diffusion Need Time?cited by 0
- 2026Does Uniform Discrete Diffusion Need Time?25 Sep 2026
- 2026Equilibrium Forcing: Adaptive Video Generation Without Noise Conditioning11 Aug 2026
- 2026Beckmann Transport Models: From Autonomous Flows to One-Step Maps3 Aug 2026
- 2026On the Redundancy of Timestep Embeddings in Diffusion Models18 Jun 2026
- 2026Condition-Wise Sinkhorn Drifting for One-Shot Learned Channel Simulation16 Jun 2026
- 2026Generative Pseudo-Force Fields for Molecular Generation18 May 2026
- 2026What Time Is It? How Data Geometry Makes Time Conditioning Optional for Flow Matching8 May 2026
- 2026Mean Mode Screaming: Mean--Variance Split Residuals for 1000-Layer Diffusion Transformers7 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Optimizing Noise Schedules of Generative Models in High Dimensionss
- 2025Diffusion models under low-noise regime
- 2026From Atoms to Entropy: Optimal Noise Allocation for Diffusion Training in the Convex Regime
- 2026PTL-Diffusion: Manifold-Aware Diffusion with Periodic Terminal Laws
- 2025Diffusion Models under Alternative Noise: Simplified Analysis and Sensitivity
- 2025Improving Diffusion Generative Models via Truncated Karhunen--Lo`eve Expansion
- 2026Exploring Time Conditioning in Diffusion Generative Models from Disjoint Noisy Data Manifolds
- 2024GUD: Generation with Unified Diffusion