Blind denoising diffusion models and the blessings of dimensionality
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling
Abstract (arXiv)
Denoising diffusion models (DDMs) are state-of-the-art methods for learning densities from data across numerous domains, yet many aspects of the training and sampling pipeline remain poorly understood. In particular, noise conditioning requires practitioners to incorporate contrived unprincipled noise embeddings into neural network architectures and to use ad hoc noise schedules for sampling. To address these drawbacks, we provide a complete theory for blind denoising diffusion models (BDDMs): a variant of DDMs where the noise amplitude is not passed into the neural network during training or sampling, obviating the need for the aforementioned design choices. We justify the correctness of BDDMs as a sampling algorithm under an assumption of low intrinsic dimensionality of the underlying data distribution relative to the ambient dimension. This assumption arises through the introduction of the Bayesian problem of estimating noise levels from a single noisy sample, which might be of independent interest. We empirically compare the performance of BDDMs to standard DDMs, showcasing the benefits of an adaptive scheme which is rigorously justified by our analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 30 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.
Builds on
30 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 16
Same direction, newest first
- 2026High-accuracy sampling for diffusion models and log-concave distributions1 Feb
- 2026High-accuracy and dimension-free sampling with diffusions15 Jan
- 2025Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models?18 Feb
- 2025Adaptivity and Convergence of Probability Flow ODEs in Diffusion Generative Models31 Jan
- 2024Denoising diffusion probabilistic models are optimally adaptive to unknown low dimensionality24 Oct
- 2024Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis11 Oct
- 2024Adapting to Unknown Low-Dimensional Structures in Score-Based Diffusion Models23 May
- 2023Generalization in diffusion models arises from geometry-adaptive harmonic representations4 Oct
- 2023KL Convergence Guarantees for Score diffusion models under minimal data assumptions23 Aug
- 2023Nearly d-Linear Convergence Bounds for Diffusion Models via Stochastic Localization7 Aug
- 2022Convergence of score-based generative modeling for general data distributions26 Sep
- 2022Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptions22 Sep
4 more
Other references · 14
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2022Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problemscited by 1,375
- 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,352
- 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
- 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 584
- 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 307
- 2019Robust and interpretable blind image denoising via bias-free convolutional neural networkscited by 87
- 2020Solving Linear Inverse Problems Using the Prior Implicit in a Denoisercited by 78
- 2022Verifying the Union of Manifolds Hypothesis for Image Datacited by 62
- 2025Equilibrium Matching: Generative Modeling with Implicit Energy-Based Modelscited by 18
2 more
- 2020One Size Fits All: Can We Train One Denoiser for All Noise Levels?cited by 10
- 2014The local low-dimensionality of natural imagescited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026The Geometry of Noise: Why Diffusion Models Don't Need Noise Conditioningcited by 8
- 2026What Time Is It? How Data Geometry Makes Time Conditioning Optional for Flow Matchingcited by 2
- 2026Beckmann Transport Models: From Autonomous Flows to One-Step Mapscited by 2
- 2026Generative Pseudo-Force Fields for Molecular Generationcited by 1
- 2026On the Redundancy of Timestep Embeddings in Diffusion Modelscited by 0
- 2026Equilibrium Forcing: Adaptive Video Generation Without Noise Conditioningcited by 0
- 2026A statistical theory for blind denoising: minimax estimation of the noise level from a single samplecited by 0
- 2026Velocity Scaling in Flow Matchingcited by 0
- 2026Velocity Scaling in Flow Matching7 Oct 2026
- 2026A statistical theory for blind denoising: minimax estimation of the noise level from a single sample26 Sep 2026
- 2026Equilibrium Forcing: Adaptive Video Generation Without Noise Conditioning11 Aug 2026
- 2026Beckmann Transport Models: From Autonomous Flows to One-Step Maps3 Aug 2026
- 2026On the Redundancy of Timestep Embeddings in Diffusion Models18 Jun 2026
- 2026Generative Pseudo-Force Fields for Molecular Generation18 May 2026
- 2026What Time Is It? How Data Geometry Makes Time Conditioning Optional for Flow Matching8 May 2026
- 2026The Geometry of Noise: Why Diffusion Models Don't Need Noise Conditioning20 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2021Bilateral Denoising Diffusion Models
- 2025Diffusion models under low-noise regime
- 2025Low-dimensional adaptation of diffusion models: Convergence in total variation
- 2023Interpreting and Improving Diffusion Models from an Optimization Perspective
- 2024Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Noise Classifier and Benefits from Contrastive Training
- 2024Score-Optimal Diffusion Schedules
- 2026Diffusion Models for High-Dimensional Clustered Data: Intrinsic-Dimension Adaptivity via Bayesian Classification
- 2023Fast Inference in Denoising Diffusion Models via MMD Finetuning