mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vichara: Appellate Judgment Prediction and Explanation for the Indian Judicial System

arXiv 2602.18346 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In jurisdictions like India, where courts face an extensive backlog of cases, artificial intelligence offers transformative potential for legal judgment prediction. A critical subset of this backlog comprises appellate cases, which are formal decisions issued by higher courts reviewing the rulings of lower courts. To this end, we present Vichara, a novel framework tailored to the Indian judicial system that predicts and explains appellate judgments. Vichara processes English-language appellate case proceeding documents and decomposes them into decision points. Decision points are discrete legal determinations that encapsulate the legal issue, deciding authority, outcome, reasoning, and temporal context. The structured representation isolates the core determinations and their context, enabling accurate predictions and interpretable explanations. Vichara's explanations follow a structured format inspired by the IRAC (Issue-Rule-Application-Conclusion) framework and adapted for Indian legal reasoning. This enhances interpretability, allowing legal professionals to assess the soundness of predictions efficiently. We evaluate Vichara on two datasets, PredEx and the expert-annotated subset of the Indian Legal Documents Corpus (ILDC_expert), using four large language models: GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-8B, Mistral-7B, and Qwen2.5-7B. Vichara surpasses existing judgment prediction benchmarks on both datasets, with GPT-4o mini achieving the highest performance (F1: 81.5 on PredEx, 80.3 on ILDC_expert), followed by Llama-3.1-8B. Human evaluation of the generated explanations across Clarity, Linking, and Usefulness metrics highlights GPT-4o mini's superior interpretability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.

Builds on

8 of 21 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 208
  2. 2018CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Predictioncited by 168
  3. 2024Segment Any Text: A Universal Approach for Robust, Efficient and Adaptable Sentence Segmentationcited by 41
  4. 2019Identification of Rhetorical Roles of Sentences in Indian Legal Judgmentscited by 39
  5. 2017Predicting the Law Area and Decisions of French Supreme Court Casescited by 30
  6. 2024Legal Judgment Reimagined: PredEx and the Rise of Intelligent AI Interpretation in Indian Courtscited by 15
  7. 2023Japanese Tort-case Dataset for Rationale-supported Legal Judgment Predictioncited by 5
  8. 2023A Hierarchical Neural Framework for Classification and its Explanation in Large Unstructured Legal Documentscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.