mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reducing Text Bias in Synthetically Generated MCQAs for VLMs in Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2602.17677 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.CL cs.ROcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Driving VLMs and open-vocabulary detection

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Multiple Choice Question Answering (MCQA) benchmarks are an established standard for measuring Vision Language Model (VLM) performance in driving tasks. However, we observe the known phenomenon that synthetically generated MCQAs are highly susceptible to hidden textual cues that allow models to exploit linguistic patterns rather than visual context. Our results show that a VLM fine-tuned on such data can achieve accuracy comparable to human-validated benchmarks even without visual input. Our proposed method reduces blind accuracy from +66.9% above random to +2.9%, eliminating the vast majority of exploitable textual shortcuts. By decoupling the correct answer from linguistic artifacts and employing a curriculum learning strategy, we force the model to rely on visual grounding, ensuring that performance accurately reflects perceptual understanding.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Driving VLMs and open-vocabulary detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.

Builds on

9 of 15 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AutoDrive-QA: A Multiple-Choice Benchmark for Vision-Language Evaluation in Urban Autonomous Driving20 Mar
  2. 2025Are VLMs Ready for Autonomous Driving? An Empirical Study from the Reliability, Data, and Metric Perspectives7 Jan
  3. 2024Can LVLMs Obtain a Driver's License? A Benchmark Towards Reliable AGI for Autonomous Driving4 Sep

Other references · 6

  1. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  2. 2022DRAMA: Joint Risk Localization and Captioning in Drivingcited by 125
  3. 2025Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model Evaluationcited by 28
  4. 2024Distractor Generation in Multiple-Choice Tasks: A Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Evaluationcited by 25
  5. 2025Are Vision LLMs Road-Ready? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Safety-Critical Driving Video Understandingcited by 13
  6. 2024Addressing Blind Guessing: Calibration of Selection Bias in Multiple-Choice Question Answering by Video Language Modelscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Multi-Frame, Lightweight & Efficient Vision-Language Models for Question Answering in Autonomous Driving
  2. 2026Efficient Visual Question Answering Pipeline for Autonomous Driving via Scene Region Compression
  3. 2023LingoQA: Visual Question Answering for Autonomous Driving
  4. 2025VLMs Guided Interpretable Decision Making for Autonomous Driving
  5. 2025TinyDrive: Multiscale Visual Question Answering with Selective Token Routing for Autonomous Driving
  6. 2025DynRsl-VLM: Enhancing Autonomous Driving Perception with Dynamic Resolution Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025ReasonDrive: Efficient Visual Question Answering for Autonomous Vehicles with Reasoning-Enhanced Small Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Evaluating Small Vision-Language Models on Distance-Dependent Traffic Perception