mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conditional Flow Matching for Continuous Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving on a Manifold-Aware Spectral Space

arXiv 2602.17586 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2026cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics

Abstract (arXiv)

Safety validation for Level 4 autonomous vehicles (AVs) is currently bottlenecked by the inability to scale the detection of rare, high-risk long-tail scenarios using traditional rule-based heuristics. We present Deep-Flow, an unsupervised framework for safety-critical anomaly detection that utilizes Optimal Transport Conditional Flow Matching (OT-CFM) to characterize the continuous probability density of expert human driving behavior. Unlike standard generative approaches that operate in unstable, high-dimensional coordinate spaces, Deep-Flow constrains the generative process to a low-rank spectral manifold via a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) bottleneck. This ensures kinematic smoothness by design and enables the computation of the exact Jacobian trace for numerically stable, deterministic log-likelihood estimation. To resolve multi-modal ambiguity at complex junctions, we utilize an Early Fusion Transformer encoder with lane-aware goal conditioning, featuring a direct skip-connection to the flow head to maintain intent-integrity throughout the network. We introduce a kinematic complexity weighting scheme that prioritizes high-energy maneuvers (quantified via path tortuosity and jerk) during the simulation-free training process. Evaluated on the Waymo Open Motion Dataset (WOMD), our framework achieves an AUC-ROC of 0.766 against a heuristic golden set of safety-critical events. More significantly, our analysis reveals a fundamental distinction between kinematic danger and semantic non-compliance. Deep-Flow identifies a critical predictability gap by surfacing out-of-distribution behaviors, such as lane-boundary violations and non-normative junction maneuvers, that traditional safety filters overlook. This work provides a mathematically rigorous foundation for defining statistical safety gates, enabling objective, data-driven validation for the safe deployment of autonomous fleets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2026.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Efficient Virtuoso: A Latent Diffusion Transformer Model for Goal-Conditioned Trajectory Planning3 Sep

Other references · 19

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  3. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  4. 2022Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesiscited by 1,023
  5. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 835
  6. 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 532
  7. 2020VectorNet: Encoding HD Maps and Agent Dynamics from Vectorized Representationcited by 528
  8. 2018ChauffeurNet: Learning to Drive by Imitating the Best and Synthesizing the Worstcited by 391
  9. 2023GPT-Driver: Learning to Drive with GPTcited by 344
  10. 2022Wayformer: Motion Forecasting via Simple & Efficient Attention Networkscited by 279
  11. 2022Motion Transformer with Global Intention Localization and Local Movement Refinementcited by 267
  12. 2023MotionDiffuser: Controllable Multi-Agent Motion Prediction using Diffusioncited by 210
7 more
  1. 2023MotionLM: Multi-Agent Motion Forecasting as Language Modelingcited by 154
  2. 2023TrafficBots: Towards World Models for Autonomous Driving Simulation and Motion Predictioncited by 56
  3. 2019Towards Corner Case Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 39
  4. 2024DriveGPT: Scaling Autoregressive Behavior Models for Drivingcited by 29
  5. 2025From Imitation to Optimization: A Comparative Study of Offline Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 4
  6. 2025Mining the Long Tail: A Comparative Study of Data-Centric Criticality Metrics for Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning in Autonomous Motion Planningcited by 2
  7. 2025Semantic-Drive: Democratizing Long-Tail Data Curation via Open-Vocabulary Grounding and Neuro-Symbolic VLM Consensuscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Conditional Flow-VAE for Safety-Critical Traffic Scenario Generation
  2. 2026Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction via Transformer-Based Models
  3. 2024DeepMF: Deep Motion Factorization for Closed-Loop Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Simulation
  4. 2025FlowDrive: Energy Flow Field for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  5. 2025TrajFlow: Multi-modal Motion Prediction via Flow Matching
  6. 2026Localized Conformal Safety Monitoring with Vision-Language Models for Autonomous Driving
  7. 2025Time-reversed Flow Matching with Worst Transport in High-dimensional Latent Space for Image Anomaly Detection
  8. 2026Adaptive Time Step Flow Matching for Autonomous Driving Motion Planning