mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RIVA: Leveraging LLM Agents for Reliable Configuration Drift Detection

arXiv 2603.02345 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.MAcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Infrastructure as code (IaC) tools automate cloud provisioning but verifying that deployed systems remain consistent with the IaC specifications remains challenging. Such configuration drift occurs because of bugs in the IaC specification, manual changes, or system updates. Large language model (LLM)-based agentic AI systems can automate the analysis of large volumes of telemetry data, making them suitable for the detection of configuration drift. However, existing agentic systems implicitly assume that the tools they invoke always return correct outputs, making them vulnerable to erroneous tool responses. Since agents cannot distinguish whether an anomalous tool output reflects a real infrastructure problem or a broken tool, such errors may cause missed drift or false alarms, reducing reliability precisely when it is most needed. We introduce RIVA (Robust Infrastructure by Verification Agents), a novel multi-agent system that performs robust IaC verification even when tools produce incorrect or misleading outputs. RIVA employs two specialized agents, a verifier agent and a tool generation agent, that collaborate through iterative cross-validation, multi-perspective verification, and tool call history tracking. Evaluation on the AIOpsLab benchmark demonstrates that RIVA, in the presence of erroneous tool responses, recovers task accuracy from 27.3% when using a baseline ReAct agent to 50.0% on average. RIVA also improves task accuracy 28% to 43.8% without erroneous tool responses. Our results show that cross-validation of diverse tool calls enables more reliable autonomous infrastructure verification in production cloud environments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.

Builds on

14 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures29 Sep
  2. 2025An Approach to Checking Correctness for Agentic Systems19 Aug
  3. 2025Cloud Infrastructure Management in the Age of AI Agents13 Jun
  4. 2024Building AI Agents for Autonomous Clouds: Challenges and Design Principles16 Jul
  5. 2024Exploring LLM-based Agents for Root Cause Analysis7 Mar

Other references · 9

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  3. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  4. 2025VeriGuard: Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Verified Code Generationcited by 49
  5. 2024Tools Fail: Detecting Silent Errors in Faulty Toolscited by 25
  6. 2025PALADIN: Self-Correcting Language Model Agents to Cure Tool-Failure Casescited by 22
  7. 2018Where Are The Gaps? A Systematic Mapping Study of Infrastructure as Code Researchcited by 9
  8. 2025Automated Cloud Infrastructure-as-Code Reconciliation with AI Agentscited by 5
  9. 2023Exploring Security Practices in Infrastructure as Code: An Empirical Studycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Why Do AI Agents Systematically Fail at Cloud Root Cause Analysis?
  2. 2025Multi-Agent Code-Orchestrated Generation for Reliable Infrastructure-as-Code
  3. 2026TerraRepair: A Tool-Grounded LLM Agent for Infrastructure-as-Code Repair
  4. 2026AOI: Turning Failed Trajectories into Training Signals for Autonomous Cloud Diagnosis
  5. 2026Agentic Security: A Systematization of Tools, Failure Modes, and Design Laws for LLM-Driven Penetration Testing
  6. 2026Towards Agentic Cloud Engineering: Graph and Loop Engineering with a Zero-Trust Agent Harness
  7. 2026AgentFixer: From Failure Detection to Fix Recommendations in LLM Agentic Systems
  8. 2025LADs: Leveraging LLMs for AI-Driven DevOps