Hunt Globally: Wide Search AI Agents for Drug Asset Scouting in Investing, Business Development, and Competitive Intelligence
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Bio-pharmaceutical innovation has shifted: many new drug assets now originate outside the United States and are disclosed primarily via regional, non-English channels. Recent data suggests over 85% of patent filings originate outside the U.S., with China accounting for nearly half of the global total; a growing share of scholarly output is also non-U.S. Industry estimates put China at 30% of global drug development, spanning 1,200+ novel candidates. In this high-stakes environment, failing to surface "under-the-radar" assets creates multi-billion-dollar risk for investors and business development teams, making asset scouting a coverage-critical competition where speed and completeness drive value. Yet today's Deep Research AI agents still lag human experts in achieving high-recall discovery across heterogeneous, multilingual sources without hallucinations. We propose a benchmarking methodology for drug asset scouting and a tuned, tree-based self-learning Bioptic Agent aimed at complete, non-hallucinated scouting. We construct a challenging completeness benchmark using a multilingual multi-agent pipeline: complex user queries paired with ground-truth assets that are largely outside U.S.-centric radar. To reflect real deal complexity, we collected screening queries from expert investors, BD, and VC professionals, and used them as priors to conditionally generate benchmark queries. For grading, we use LLM-as-judge evaluation calibrated to expert opinions. On this benchmark, our Bioptic Agent achieves 79.7% F1 score, outperforming Gemini 3.1 Deep Think (59.2%), Gemini 3.1 Pro Deep Research (58.6%), Claude Opus 4.6 (56.2%), OpenAI GPT-5.2 Pro (46.6%), Perplexity Deep Research (44.2%), and Exa Websets (26.9%). Performance improves steeply with additional compute, supporting the view that more compute yields better results.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 5
- 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
- 2025An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agentscited by 165
- 2025ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research Agentscited by 80
- 2026DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agentscited by 44
- 2026DRACO: a Cross-Domain Benchmark for Deep Research Accuracy, Completeness, and Objectivitycited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Productioncited by 1
- 2026AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Production14 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Beyond Cash Flows: A Multi-Agent AI Framework for Valuing Clinical-Stage, Cross-Border Biotechnology ↗
- 2026Curated AI beats frontier LLMs at pharma asset discovery
- 2025Can AI Agents Design and Implement Drug Discovery Pipelines?
- 2026Do AI-Native Biotechs Need Departments? Benchmarking Company World Models for AI-Driven Drug Development
- 2025MADD: Multi-Agent Drug Discovery Orchestra
- 2026AI Scientists Are Only as Good as Their Evidence: A Stratified Ablation of Proprietary Data and Reasoning Skills in Drug-Asset Valuation
- 2026AlphaDiverse: Post-Training Local Quantitative Research Agents for Diverse Exploration in Alpha Factor Mining
- 2024DrugAgent: Automating AI-aided Drug Discovery Programming through LLM Multi-Agent Collaboration