mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Importance-Aware Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2511.07074 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2025cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning plays a critical role in enhancing the performance and efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs). Its success depends not only on the quality of the instruction data but also on the inherent capabilities of the LLM itself. Some studies suggest that even a small amount of high-quality data can achieve instruction fine-tuning results that are on par with, or even exceed, those from using a full-scale dataset. However, rather than focusing solely on calculating data quality scores to evaluate instruction data, there is a growing need to select high-quality data that maximally enhances the performance of instruction tuning for a given LLM. In this paper, we propose the Model Instruction Weakness Value (MIWV) as a novel metric to quantify the importance of instruction data in enhancing model's capabilities. The MIWV metric is derived from the discrepancies in the model's responses when using In-Context Learning (ICL), helping identify the most beneficial data for enhancing instruction tuning performance. Our experimental results demonstrate that selecting only the top 1% of data based on MIWV can outperform training on the full dataset. Furthermore, this approach extends beyond existing research that focuses on data quality scoring for data selection, offering strong empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of our proposed method.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2025.

Builds on

36 of 52 references.

References · 36

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  7. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  8. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  9. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  10. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  11. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  12. 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
24 more
  1. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 515
  2. 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
  3. 2023Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4cited by 369
  4. 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 357
  5. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  6. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 322
  7. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  8. 2023Magicoder: Empowering Code Generation with OSS-Instructcited by 251
  9. 2024mGTE: Generalized Long-Context Text Representation and Reranking Models for Multilingual Text Retrievalcited by 233
  10. 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 230
  11. 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 211
  12. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192
  13. 2023MMC: Advancing Multimodal Chart Understanding with Large-scale Instruction Tuningcited by 149
  14. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 134
  15. 2023On the Exploitability of Instruction Tuningcited by 110
  16. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  17. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  18. 2023Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Taskscited by 53
  19. 2023Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 52
  20. 2023Do Emergent Abilities Exist in Quantized Large Language Models: An Empirical Studycited by 43
  21. 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Modelscited by 29
  22. 2023Koala: An Index for Quantifying Overlaps with Pre-training Corporacited by 19
  23. 2024RECOST: External Knowledge Guided Data-efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 18
  24. 2024Llama-Mob: Instruction-Tuning Llama-3-8B Excels in City-Scale Mobility Predictioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.