mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

No Need to Train Your RDB Foundation Model

arXiv 2602.13697 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2026cs.AI cs.DB cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Relational databases (RDBs) contain vast amounts of heterogeneous tabular information that can be exploited for predictive modeling purposes. But since the space of potential targets is vast across enterprise settings, how can we avoid retraining a new model each time we wish to predict a new quantity of interest? Foundation models based on in-context learning (ICL) offer a convenient option, but so far are largely restricted to single-table operability. In generalizing to multiple interrelated tables, it is essential to compress variably-sized RDB neighborhoods into fixed-length ICL samples for consumption by the decoder. However, the details here are critical: unlike existing supervised learning RDB pipelines, we provide theoretical and empirical evidence that ICL-specific compression should be constrained within high-dimensional RDB columns where all entities share units and roles, not across columns where the relevance of heterogeneous data types cannot be determined without extensive label information. Conditioned on this restriction, we then demonstrate that encoder expressiveness is actually not compromised by excluding trainable parameters. Hence we arrive at a principled family of RDB encoders that can be seamlessly paired with already-existing single-table ICL foundation models, whereby no training or fine-tuning is required. From a practical standpoint, we develop scalable SQL primitives to implement the encoder stage, resulting in the easy-to-use open-source RDBLearn foundation model capable of robust performance on unseen datasets out of the box.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2026.

Builds on

49 of 82 references.

References · 49

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
  3. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
  4. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  5. 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 673
  6. 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
  7. 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 581
  8. 2020Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Netscited by 477
  9. 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 368
  10. 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
  11. 2020SIGN: Scalable Inception Graph Neural Networkscited by 283
  12. 2025TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Datacited by 267
37 more
  1. 2025TabPFN-2.5: Advancing the State of the Art in Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 115
  2. 2024RelBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning on Relational Databasescited by 90
  3. 2019Relational Graph Attention Networkscited by 81
  4. 2024Large Language Models Can Automatically Engineer Features for Few-Shot Tabular Learningcited by 79
  5. 2024OpenGraph: Towards Open Graph Foundation Modelscited by 75
  6. 2025Mitra: Mixed Synthetic Priors for Enhancing Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 67
  7. 2025LimiX: Unleashing Structured-Data Modeling Capability for Generalist Intelligencecited by 65
  8. 2023Statistical Foundations of Prior-Data Fitted Networkscited by 59
  9. 2023Relational Deep Learning: Graph Representation Learning on Relational Databasescited by 55
  10. 2025Position: Graph Learning Will Lose Relevance Due To Poor Benchmarkscited by 52
  11. 2024AnyGraph: Graph Foundation Model in the Wildcited by 51
  12. 2020Supervised Learning on Relational Databases with Graph Neural Networkscited by 48
  13. 2025Griffin: Towards a Graph-Centric Relational Database Foundation Modelcited by 41
  14. 2025Relational Transformer: Toward Zero-Shot Foundation Models for Relational Datacited by 32
  15. 2025Relational Graph Transformercited by 30
  16. 2025Turning Tabular Foundation Models into Graph Foundation Modelscited by 30
  17. 2025Large Language Models are Good Relational Learnerscited by 22
  18. 2025Relational Deep Learning: Challenges, Foundations and Next-Generation Architecturescited by 22
  19. 2025GraphPFN: A Prior-Data Fitted Graph Foundation Modelcited by 20
  20. 2026RelBench v2: A Large-Scale Benchmark and Repository for Relational Datacited by 17
  21. 2023GFS: Graph-based Feature Synthesis for Prediction over Relational Databasescited by 16
  22. 2024Tackling prediction tasks in relational databases with LLMscited by 14
  23. 2025Bringing Graphs to the Table: Zero-shot Node Classification via Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 12
  24. 2022Less is More: SlimG for Accurate, Robust, and Interpretable Graph Miningcited by 10
  25. 2023Meta-Path Learning for Multi-relational Graph Neural Networkscited by 10
  26. 2024ELF-Gym: Evaluating Large Language Models Generated Features for Tabular Predictioncited by 10
  27. 2025TabPFN: One Model to Rule Them All?cited by 10
  28. 2022R-GCN: The R Could Stand for Randomcited by 9
  29. 2024Transformers Meet Relational Databasescited by 9
  30. 2025RDB2G-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Automatic Graph Modeling of Relational Databasescited by 8
  31. 2025Can TabPFN Compete with GNNs for Node Classification via Graph Tabularization?cited by 8
  32. 2025AutoG: Towards automatic graph construction from tabular datacited by 6
  33. 2023Do Not Train It: A Linear Neural Architecture Search of Graph Neural Networkscited by 5
  34. 2023RDBench: ML Benchmark for Relational Databasescited by 3
  35. 2025Agent Bain vs. Agent McKinsey: A New Text-to-SQL Benchmark for the Business Domaincited by 3
  36. 2026ReFuGe: Feature Generation for Prediction Tasks on Relational Databases with LLM Agentscited by 3
  37. 2025On the Effectiveness of Random Weights in Graph Neural Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.