mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Less is More: SlimG for Accurate, Robust, and Interpretable Graph Mining

arXiv 2210.04081 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.SIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How can we solve semi-supervised node classification in various graphs possibly with noisy features and structures? Graph neural networks (GNNs) have succeeded in many graph mining tasks, but their generalizability to various graph scenarios is limited due to the difficulty of training, hyperparameter tuning, and the selection of a model itself. Einstein said that we should "make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." We rephrase it into the careful simplicity principle: a carefully-designed simple model can surpass sophisticated ones in real-world graphs. Based on the principle, we propose SlimG for semi-supervised node classification, which exhibits four desirable properties: It is (a) accurate, winning or tying on 10 out of 13 real-world datasets; (b) robust, being the only one that handles all scenarios of graph data (homophily, heterophily, random structure, noisy features, etc.); (c) fast and scalable, showing up to 18 times faster training in million-scale graphs; and (d) interpretable, thanks to the linearity and sparsity. We explain the success of SlimG through a systematic study of the designs of existing GNNs, sanity checks, and comprehensive ablation studies.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2022.

Builds on

28 of 45 references.

References · 28

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  5. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  6. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  7. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
  8. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  9. 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,470
  10. 2018Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 1,133
  11. 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
  12. 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 987
16 more
  1. 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 970
  2. 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 857
  3. 2020Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 821
  4. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
  5. 2020Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural Networkcited by 592
  6. 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 543
  7. 2019DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go as Deep as CNNs?cited by 527
  8. 2019Diffusion Improves Graph Learningcited by 414
  9. 2021Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methodscited by 309
  10. 2020Towards Deeper Graph Neural Networkscited by 296
  11. 2020Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models Out-performs Graph Neural Networkscited by 199
  12. 2022How to Find Your Friendly Neighborhood: Graph Attention Design with Self-Supervisioncited by 102
  13. 2021Dissecting the Diffusion Process in Linear Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 58
  14. 2021Twitch Gamers: a Dataset for Evaluating Proximity Preserving and Structural Role-based Node Embeddingscited by 48
  15. 2021Meta Propagation Networks for Graph Few-shot Semi-supervised Learningcited by 25
  16. 2017Kernel-based Inference of Functions over Graphscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.