Zero-Sacrifice Persistent-Robustness Adversarial Defense for Pre-Trained Encoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread use of publicly available pre-trained encoders from self-supervised learning (SSL) has exposed a critical vulnerability: their susceptibility to downstream-agnostic adversarial examples (DAEs), which are crafted without knowledge of the downstream tasks but capable of misleading downstream models. While several defense methods have been explored recently, they rely primarily on task-specific adversarial fine-tuning, which inevitably limits generalizability and causes catastrophic forgetting and deteriorates benign performance. Different with previous works, we propose a more rigorous defense goal that requires only a single tuning for diverse downstream tasks to defend against DAEs and preserve benign performance. To achieve this defense goal, we introduce Zero-Sacrifice Persistent-Robustness Adversarial Defense (ZePAD), which is inspired by the inherent sensitivity of neural networks to data characteristics. Specifically, ZePAD is a dual-branch structure, which consists of a Multi-Pattern Adversarial Enhancement Branch (MPAE-Branch) that uses two adversarially fine-tuned encoders to strengthen adversarial resistance. The Benign Memory Preservation Branch (BMP-Branch) is trained on local data to ensure adversarial robustness does not compromise benign performance. Surprisingly, we find that ZePAD can directly detect DAEs by evaluating branch confidence, without introducing any adversarial exsample identification task during training. Notably, by enriching feature diversity, our method enables a single adversarial fine-tuning to defend against DAEs across downstream tasks, thereby achieving persistent robustness. Extensive experiments on 11 SSL methods and 6 datasets validate its effectiveness. In certain cases, it achieves a 29.20% improvement in benign performance and a 73.86% gain in adversarial robustness, highlighting its zero-sacrifice property.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.
Builds on
43 of 53 references.
References · 43
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
31 more
- 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
- 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
- 2021With a Little Help from My Friends: Nearest-Neighbor Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 326
- 2020Whitening for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 279
- 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 249
- 2023CLIP-Driven Universal Model for Organ Segmentation and Tumor Detectioncited by 224
- 2020A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 180
- 2022CLIP2Point: Transfer CLIP to Point Cloud Classification with Image-Depth Pre-trainingcited by 160
- 2020Better Fine-Tuning by Reducing Representational Collapsecited by 157
- 2021Self-Supervised Models are Continual Learnerscited by 149
- 2022Towards Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Pre-training Modelscited by 144
- 2021ReSSL: Relational Self-Supervised Learning with Weak Augmentationcited by 84
- 2022Protecting Facial Privacy: Generating Adversarial Identity Masks via Style-robust Makeup Transfercited by 78
- 2021Probabilistic Margins for Instance Reweighting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 57
- 2019Interpolated Adversarial Training: Achieving Robust Neural Networks without Sacrificing Too Much Accuracycited by 49
- 2021Exploring the Equivalence of Siamese Self-Supervised Learning via A Unified Gradient Frameworkcited by 49
- 2022PoisonedEncoder: Poisoning the Unlabeled Pre-training Data in Contrastive Learningcited by 34
- 2023Downstream-agnostic Adversarial Examplescited by 32
- 2018Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 21
- 2024Securely Fine-tuning Pre-trained Encoders Against Adversarial Examplescited by 21
- 2022Pre-trained Adversarial Perturbationscited by 16
- 2024DAT: Improving Adversarial Robustness via Generative Amplitude Mix-up in Frequency Domaincited by 12
- 2024I Don't Know You, But I Can Catch You: Real-Time Defense against Diverse Adversarial Patches for Object Detectorscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.