mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks

arXiv 1810.00470 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2018cs.CR stat.MLcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Convolutional Networks (DCNs) have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial examples---perturbed inputs specifically designed to produce intentional errors in the learning algorithms at test time. Existing input-agnostic adversarial perturbations exhibit interesting visual patterns that are currently unexplained. In this paper, we introduce a structured approach for generating Universal Adversarial Perturbations (UAPs) with procedural noise functions. Our approach unveils the systemic vulnerability of popular DCN models like Inception v3 and YOLO v3, with single noise patterns able to fool a model on up to 90% of the dataset. Procedural noise allows us to generate a distribution of UAPs with high universal evasion rates using only a few parameters. Additionally, we propose Bayesian optimization to efficiently learn procedural noise parameters to construct inexpensive untargeted black-box attacks. We demonstrate that it can achieve an average of less than 10 queries per successful attack, a 100-fold improvement on existing methods. We further motivate the use of input-agnostic defences to increase the stability of models to adversarial perturbations. The universality of our attacks suggests that DCN models may be sensitive to aggregations of low-level class-agnostic features. These findings give insight on the nature of some universal adversarial perturbations and how they could be generated in other applications.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 10; 2022: 6; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022"Real Attackers Don't Compute Gradients": Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial ML Research and Practicecited by 55
  2. 2021Object Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based 3D Object Detectorscited by 15
  3. 2022Smart App Attack: Hacking Deep Learning Models in Android Appscited by 12
  4. 2022Analysis and Extensions of Adversarial Training for Video Classificationcited by 11
  5. 2022UniCR: Universally Approximated Certified Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 10
  6. 2021Real-time Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Reinforcement Learning Policies: Attacks and Defensescited by 9
  7. 2021Real-time Detection of Practical Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 6
  8. 2021Realizable Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Malwarecited by 5
  9. 2021Adversarial Examples Detection beyond Image Spacecited by 5
  10. 2021Jacobian Regularization for Mitigating Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 4
  11. 2022Jacobian Ensembles Improve Robustness Trade-offs to Adversarial Attackscited by 4
  12. 2024Anonymity Unveiled: A Practical Framework for Auditing Data Use in Deep Learning Modelscited by 4
9 more
  1. 2021Perlin Noise Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 2
  2. 2021Custom Object Detection via Multi-Camera Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1
  3. 2021BO-DBA: Query-Efficient Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks via Bayesian Optimizationcited by 1
  4. 2022NetSentry: A Deep Learning Approach to Detecting Incipient Large-scale Network Attackscited by 1
  5. 2024Sparse and Transferable Universal Singular Vectors Attackcited by 1
  6. 2025Adversarial Examples in Environment Perception for Automated Driving (Review)cited by 1
  7. 2021On Procedural Adversarial Noise Attack And Defensecited by 0
  8. 2025VICTOR: Dataset Copyright Auditing in Video Recognition Systemscited by 0
  9. 2026Zero-Sacrifice Persistent-Robustness Adversarial Defense for Pre-Trained Encoderscited by 0