mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Computationally Efficient Replicable Learning of Parities and Applications

arXiv 2602.09499 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the computational relationship between replicability (Impagliazzo et al. [STOC `22], Ghazi et al. [NeurIPS `21]) and other stability notions. Specifically, we focus on replicable PAC learning and its connections to differential privacy (Dwork et al. [TCC 2006]) and to the statistical query (SQ) model (Kearns [JACM `98]). Statistically, it was known that differentially private learning and replicable learning are equivalent and strictly more powerful than SQ-learning. Yet, computationally, all previously known efficient (i.e., polynomial-time) replicable learning algorithms were confined to SQ-learnable tasks or restricted distributions, in contrast to differentially private learning. Our main contribution is the first computationally efficient replicable algorithm for realizable learning of parities over arbitrary distributions, a task that is known to be hard in the SQ-model, but possible under differential privacy. This result provides the first evidence that efficient replicable learning over general distributions strictly extends efficient SQ-learning, and is closer in power to efficient differentially private learning, despite computational separations between replicability and privacy. Additionally, we leverage our parity learner to prove that, assuming RP neq NP, converting replicability to pure differential privacy requires a strict loss in sample complexity. Our main building block is a new, efficient, and replicable algorithm that, given a set of vectors, outputs a subspace of their linear span that covers most of them.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 103
  2. 2015Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 88
  3. 2020An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 64
  4. 2022Robustness Implies Privacy in Statistical Estimationcited by 47
  5. 2022Reproducibility in Learningcited by 44
  6. 2023Stability is Stable: Connections between Replicability, Privacy, and Adaptive Generalizationcited by 42
  7. 2023From Robustness to Privacy and Backcited by 27
  8. 2022Privacy Induces Robustness: Information-Computation Gaps and Sparse Mean Estimationcited by 25
  9. 2022Replicable Banditscited by 22
  10. 2023Replicable Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  11. 2023Replicability in Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  12. 2023Replicable Clusteringcited by 19
11 more
  1. 2016Adaptive Learning with Robust Generalization Guaranteescited by 15
  2. 2023The Bayesian Stability Zoocited by 13
  3. 2024Replicability in High Dimensional Statisticscited by 8
  4. 2024On the Computational Landscape of Replicable Learningcited by 7
  5. 2024Replicable Online Learningcited by 7
  6. 2025Replicable Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 7
  7. 2024On Differentially Private Linear Algebracited by 4
  8. 2025From Generative to Episodic: Sample-Efficient Replicable Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  9. 2025Approximate Replicability in Learningcited by 3
  10. 2024The Cost of Replicability in Active Learningcited by 2
  11. 2025List Replicable Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.