Approximate Replicability in Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Replicability, introduced by (Impagliazzo et al. STOC '22), is the notion that algorithms should remain stable under a resampling of their inputs (given access to shared randomness). While a strong and interesting notion of stability, the cost of replicability can be prohibitive: there is no replicable algorithm, for instance, for tasks as simple as threshold learning (Bun et al. STOC '23). Given such strong impossibility results we ask: under what approximate notions of replicability is learning possible? In this work, we propose three natural relaxations of replicability in the context of PAC learning: (1) Pointwise: the learner must be consistent on any fixed input, but not across all inputs simultaneously, (2) Approximate: the learner must output hypotheses that classify most of the distribution consistently, (3) Semi: the algorithm is fully replicable, but may additionally use shared unlabeled samples. In all three cases, for constant replicability we obtain close to sample-optimal agnostic PAC learners: 1) and 2) are achievable using O(d/α2 + 1/α4) samples, while 3) requires Theta(d2/α2) labeled samples.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026The Sample Complexity of Replicable Realizable PAC Learningcited by 1
- 2026Model Agreement via Anchoringcited by 1
- 2026Computationally Efficient Replicable Learning of Parities and Applicationscited by 0
- 2026Model Agreement via Anchoring26 Feb 2026
- 2026The Sample Complexity of Replicable Realizable PAC Learning23 Feb 2026
- 2026Computationally Efficient Replicable Learning of Parities and Applications10 Feb 2026