Agentic Cognitive Depth: Operational Criteria for Evaluating LLM Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic large language model (LLM) systems are commonly implemented as an LLM in a loop with Planning, Memory, Tools, and Control Flow. This application-focused view connects agentic LLM research with deployable systems and leaves open how such systems should be evaluated beyond end-to-end task success. Building on this view, we define agentic cognitive depth as a trajectory-level profile across five operational criteria. The profile contains context sensitivity (C), temporal continuity (T), multimodal coordination (M), adaptive interaction (A), and metacognitive monitoring (Mc). The first four criteria measure how well Control Flow, Memory, Tools, and Planning are used across a trajectory. The fifth measures whether the system monitors and regulates the full run. For each criterion, we give operational proxies and a perturbation procedure, then connect the profile to the agent's world model. We provide the structure needed to extend benchmarks such as GAIA, SWE-bench, WebArena, and TRIP-Bench with per-criterion diagnostics. Symbolic verifiers, structured memory, planner coupling, and tool constraints provide practical ways to build and test these capacities.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025What Do LLM Agents Do When Left Alone? Evidence of Spontaneous Meta-Cognitive Patterns
- 2025From Language to Action: A Review of Large Language Models as Autonomous Agents and Tool Users
- 2026Beyond the Leaderboard: A Synthesis of Tool-Use, Planning, and Reasoning Failures in Large Language Model Agents
- 2026The Long-Horizon Task Mirage? Diagnosing Where and Why Agentic Systems Break
- 2025Beyond Task Completion: An Assessment Framework for Evaluating Agentic AI Systems
- 2026Do Agents Think Deeper? A Mechanistic Investigation of Layer-Wise Dynamics in Sequential Planning
- 2026AMA-Bench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Memory for Agentic Applications
- 2025On the Importance of Task Complexity in Evaluating LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems