mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning the Value Systems of Societies with Preference-based Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2602.08835 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2026cs.AI cs.CY cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Value-aware AI should recognise human values and adapt to the value systems (value-based preferences) of different users. This requires operationalization of values, which can be prone to misspecification. The social nature of values demands their representation to adhere to multiple users while value systems are diverse, yet exhibit patterns among groups. In sequential decision making, efforts have been made towards personalization for different goals or values from demonstrations of diverse agents. However, these approaches demand manually designed features or lack value-based interpretability and/or adaptability to diverse user preferences. We propose algorithms for learning models of value alignment and value systems for a society of agents in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), based on clustering and preference-based multi-objective reinforcement learning (PbMORL). We jointly learn socially-derived value alignment models (groundings) and a set of value systems that concisely represent different groups of users (clusters) in a society. Each cluster consists of a value system representing the value-based preferences of its members and an approximately Pareto-optimal policy that reflects behaviours aligned with this value system. We evaluate our method against a state-of-the-art PbMORL algorithm and baselines on two MDPs with human values.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

Builds on

23 of 68 references.

References · 23

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  3. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  4. 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 438
  5. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
  6. 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 298
  7. 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 171
  8. 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 166
  9. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learningcited by 147
  10. 2024MaxMin-RLHF: Alignment with Diverse Human Preferencescited by 121
  11. 2024RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregationcited by 71
  12. 2018Two-Player Games for Efficient Non-Convex Constrained Optimizationcited by 55
11 more
  1. 2019MoralStrength: Exploiting a Moral Lexicon and Embedding Similarity for Moral Foundations Predictioncited by 31
  2. 2022How to talk so AI will learn: Instructions, descriptions, and autonomycited by 22
  3. 2024MAP: Multi-Human-Value Alignment Palettecited by 20
  4. 2017Responsible Autonomycited by 18
  5. 2018Incorporating Behavioral Constraints in Online AI Systemscited by 16
  6. 2018An Efficient, Generalized Bellman Update For Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  7. 2023A computational framework for human valuescited by 10
  8. 2023Learning Human-like Representations to Enable Learning Human Valuescited by 7
  9. 2024Leveraging Sub-Optimal Data for Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  10. 2022Reinforcement Learning Guided by Provable Normative Compliancecited by 3
  11. 2025Learning the Value Systems of Societies from Preferencescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.