A computational framework for human values
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the diverse array of work investigating the nature of human values from psychology, philosophy and social sciences, there is a clear consensus that values guide behaviour. More recently, a recognition that values provide a means to engineer ethical AI has emerged. Indeed, Stuart Russell proposed shifting AI's focus away from simply ``intelligence'' towards intelligence ``provably aligned with human values''. This challenge -- the value alignment problem -- with others including an AI's learning of human values, aggregating individual values to groups, and designing computational mechanisms to reason over values, has energised a sustained research effort. Despite this, no formal, computational definition of values has yet been proposed. We address this through a formal conceptual framework rooted in the social sciences, that provides a foundation for the systematic, integrated and interdisciplinary investigation into how human values can support designing ethical AI.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.
Builds on
6 of 42 references.
References · 6
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
- 2020Trustworthy AIcited by 62
- 2017Acquiring Background Knowledge to Improve Moral Value Predictioncited by 22
- 2021Value alignment: a formal approachcited by 18
- 2019A Value-based Trust Assessment Model for Multi-agent Systemscited by 4
- 2023uHelp: intelligent volunteer search for mutual help communitiescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.
10 papers.
- 2025Enabling Personalized Long-term Interactions in LLM-based Agents through Persistent Memory and User Profilescited by 16
- 2025Learning the Value Systems of Societies from Preferencescited by 2
- 2024Value-Based Rationales Improve Social Experience: A Multiagent Simulation Studycited by 1
- 2025Instilling Organisational Values in Firefighters through Simulation-Based Trainingcited by 1
- 2026Learning the Value Systems of Agents with Preference-based and Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025Rethinking How AI Embeds and Adapts to Human Values: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 0
- 2025Value-Aware Multiagent Systemscited by 0
- 2026Learning the Value Systems of Societies with Preference-based Multi-objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Unweighted ranking for value-based decision making with uncertaintycited by 0
- 2026Building Socio-Affective Artificial Intelligence for Interactive Multi-Agent Simulationscited by 0
- 2026Building Socio-Affective Artificial Intelligence for Interactive Multi-Agent Simulations22 Sep 2026
- 2026Unweighted ranking for value-based decision making with uncertainty13 May 2026
- 2026Learning the Value Systems of Societies with Preference-based Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning9 Feb 2026
- 2026Learning the Value Systems of Agents with Preference-based and Inverse Reinforcement Learning4 Feb 2026
- 2025Instilling Organisational Values in Firefighters through Simulation-Based Training14 Dec 2025
- 2025Value-Aware Multiagent Systems14 Dec 2025
- 2025Enabling Personalized Long-term Interactions in LLM-based Agents through Persistent Memory and User Profiles9 Oct 2025
- 2025Rethinking How AI Embeds and Adapts to Human Values: Challenges and Opportunities23 Aug 2025
- 2025Learning the Value Systems of Societies from Preferences28 Jul 2025
- 2024Value-Based Rationales Improve Social Experience: A Multiagent Simulation Study4 Aug 2024