Multimodal Learning for Arcing Detection in Pantograph-Catenary Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The pantograph-catenary interface is essential for ensuring uninterrupted and reliable power delivery in electrified rail systems. However, electrical arcing at this interface poses serious risks, including accelerated wear of contact components, degraded system performance, and potential service disruptions. Detecting arcing events at the pantograph-catenary interface is challenging due to their transient nature, noisy operating environment, data scarcity, and the difficulty of distinguishing arcs from other similar transient phenomena. To address these challenges, we propose a novel multimodal framework that combines high-resolution image data with force measurements to more accurately and robustly detect arcing events. First, we construct two arcing detection datasets comprising synchronized visual and force measurements. One dataset is built from data provided by the Swiss Federal Railways (SBB), and the other is derived from publicly available videos of arcing events in different railway systems and synthetic force data that mimic the characteristics observed in the real dataset. Leveraging these datasets, we propose MultiDeepSAD, an extension of the DeepSAD algorithm for multiple modalities with a new loss formulation. Additionally, we introduce tailored pseudo-anomaly generation techniques specific to each data type, such as synthetic arc-like artifacts in images and simulated force irregularities, to augment training data and improve the discriminative ability of the model. Through extensive experiments and ablation studies, we demonstrate that our framework significantly outperforms baseline approaches, exhibiting enhanced sensitivity to real arcing events even under domain shifts and limited availability of real arcing observations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 71 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
- 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 529
- 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection Using Geometric Transformationscited by 269
- 2017Gated Multimodal Units for Information Fusioncited by 244
9 more
- 2023Multimodal Industrial Anomaly Detection by Crossmodal Feature Mappingcited by 41
- 2024MultiOOD: Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Multiple Modalitiescited by 28
- 2024Unseen Visual Anomaly Generationcited by 23
- 2025Advances in Multimodal Adaptation and Generalization: From Traditional Approaches to Foundation Modelscited by 23
- 2023NNG-Mix: Improving Semi-supervised Anomaly Detection with Pseudo-anomaly Generationcited by 14
- 2025Extremely Simple Multimodal Outlier Synthesis for Out-of-Distribution Detection and Segmentationcited by 8
- 2024Dynamic Distinction Learning: Adaptive Pseudo Anomalies for Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 6
- 2024Recall and Refine: A Simple but Effective Source-free Open-set Domain Adaptation Frameworkcited by 6
- 2025From Physics to Machine Learning and Back: Part II - Learning and Observational Bias in PHMcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.