mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning in Context, Guided by Choice: A Reward-Free Paradigm for Reinforcement Learning with Transformers

arXiv 2602.08244 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

In-context reinforcement learning (ICRL) leverages the in-context learning capabilities of transformer models (TMs) to efficiently generalize to unseen sequential decision-making tasks without parameter updates. However, existing ICRL methods rely on explicit reward signals during pretraining, which limits their applicability when rewards are ambiguous, hard to specify, or costly to obtain. To overcome this limitation, we propose a new learning paradigm, In-Context Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (ICPRL), in which both pretraining and deployment rely solely on preference feedback, eliminating the need for reward supervision. We study two variants that differ in the granularity of feedback: Immediate Preference-based RL (I-PRL) with per-step preferences, and Trajectory Preference-based RL (T-PRL) with trajectory-level comparisons. We first show that supervised pretraining, a standard approach in ICRL, remains effective under preference-only context datasets, demonstrating the feasibility of in-context reinforcement learning using only preference signals. To further improve data efficiency, we introduce alternative preference-native frameworks for I-PRL and T-PRL that directly optimize TM policies from preference data without requiring reward signals nor optimal action labels.Experiments on dueling bandits, navigation, and continuous control tasks demonstrate that ICPRL enables strong in-context generalization to unseen tasks, achieving performance comparable to ICRL methods trained with full reward supervision.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

Builds on

35 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback1 Sep
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  3. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
  4. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep
  5. 2018Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Atari15 Nov
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 29

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  3. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
  4. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
  5. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
  6. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,204
  7. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 899
  8. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 662
  9. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 590
  10. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 364
  11. 2021Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of Pessimismcited by 279
  12. 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
17 more
  1. 2022A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problemscited by 231
  2. 2022In-context Reinforcement Learning with Algorithm Distillationcited by 190
  3. 2021Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A surveycited by 188
  4. 2023Supervised Pretraining Can Learn In-Context Reinforcement Learningcited by 139
  5. 2020Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Model-Based Offline Optimizationcited by 120
  6. 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 102
  7. 2023Motif: Intrinsic Motivation from Artificial Intelligence Feedbackcited by 102
  8. 2015Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 101
  9. 2021Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimismcited by 78
  10. 2015Regret Lower Bound and Optimal Algorithm in Dueling Bandit Problemcited by 52
  11. 2023A Survey on Transformers in Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
  12. 2016Double Thompson Sampling for Dueling Banditscited by 42
  13. 2023Emergence of In-Context Reinforcement Learning from Noise Distillationcited by 27
  14. 2024In-Context Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Hierarchical Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 26
  15. 2023Efficient Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning Using Learned Dynamics Modelscited by 21
  16. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Decision Transformer: External Memory for In-context RLcited by 21
  17. 2025Yes, Q-learning Helps Offline In-Context RLcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Transformers as Decision Makers: Provable In-Context Reinforcement Learning via Supervised Pretraining
  2. 2026In-Context Reinforcement Learning under Non-Stationarity: A Survey
  3. 2024Random Policy Enables In-Context Reinforcement Learning within Trust Horizons
  4. 2024ICPL: Few-shot In-context Preference Learning via LLMs
  5. 2026In-Context Reward Adaptation for Robust Preference Modeling
  6. 2023Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward Function
  7. 2022Rewards Encoding Environment Dynamics Improves Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Transformers Provably Implement In-Context Reinforcement Learning with Policy Improvement