Reward Redistribution for CVaR MDPs using a Bellman Operator on L-infinity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tail-end risk measures such as static conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) are used in safety-critical applications to prevent rare, yet catastrophic events. Unlike risk-neutral objectives, the static CVaR of the return depends on entire trajectories without admitting a recursive Bellman decomposition in the underlying Markov decision process. A classical resolution relies on state augmentation with a continuous variable. However, unless restricted to a specialized class of admissible value functions, this formulation induces sparse rewards and degenerate fixed points. In this work, we propose a novel formulation of the static CVaR objective based on augmentation. Our alternative approach leads to a Bellman operator with: (1) dense per-step rewards; (2) contracting properties on the full space of bounded value functions. Building on this theoretical foundation, we develop risk-averse value iteration and model-free Q-learning algorithms that rely on discretized augmented states. We further provide convergence guarantees and approximation error bounds due to discretization. Empirical results demonstrate that our algorithms successfully learn CVaR-sensitive policies and achieve effective performance-safety trade-offs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2026.
Builds on
26 of 47 references.
References · 26
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
- 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 362
- 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 162
- 2014Optimizing the CVaR via Samplingcited by 98
- 2015Policy Gradient for Coherent Risk Measurescited by 74
- 2019Being Optimistic to Be Conservative: Quickly Learning a CVaR Policycited by 63
- 2020Rewriting History with Inverse RL: Hindsight Inference for Policy Improvementcited by 59
- 2017How Should a Robot Assess Risk? Towards an Axiomatic Theory of Risk in Roboticscited by 57
- 2023A Survey of Temporal Credit Assignment in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 56
- 2019Worst Cases Policy Gradientscited by 52
- 2022Efficient Risk-Averse Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
14 more
- 2023Near-Minimax-Optimal Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with CVaRcited by 32
- 2019Quantile QT-Opt for Risk-Aware Vision-Based Robotic Graspingcited by 27
- 2022Regret Bounds for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2021Reinforcement Learning with Dynamic Convex Risk Measurescited by 20
- 2023On Dynamic Programming Decompositions of Static Risk Measures in Markov Decision Processescited by 17
- 2024A Reductions Approach to Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with Optimized Certainty Equivalentscited by 15
- 2021Risk-averse autonomous systems: A brief history and recent developments from the perspective of optimal controlcited by 12
- 2023Learning Risk-Aware Quadrupedal Locomotion using Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2025Optimizing Return Distributions with Distributional Dynamic Programmingcited by 9
- 2024Q-learning for Quantile MDPs: A Decomposition, Performance, and Convergence Analysiscited by 6
- 2025Beyond CVaR: Leveraging Static Spectral Risk Measures for Enhanced Decision-Making in Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2025Return Capping: Sample-Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisationcited by 5
- 2025Yet Another Distributional Bellman Equationcited by 1
- 2025On the Fundamental Limitations of Dual Static CVaR Decompositions in Markov Decision Processescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.