Q-learning for Quantile MDPs: A Decomposition, Performance, and Convergence Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In Markov decision processes (MDPs), quantile risk measures such as Value-at-Risk are a standard metric for modeling RL agents' preferences for certain outcomes. This paper proposes a new Q-learning algorithm for quantile optimization in MDPs with strong convergence and performance guarantees. The algorithm leverages a new, simple dynamic program (DP) decomposition for quantile MDPs. Compared with prior work, our DP decomposition requires neither known transition probabilities nor solving complex saddle point equations and serves as a suitable foundation for other model-free RL algorithms. Our numerical results in tabular domains show that our Q-learning algorithm converges to its DP variant and outperforms earlier algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2024.
Builds on
19 of 52 references.
References · 19
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
- 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 362
- 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
- 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 162
- 2013Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 129
- 2014Algorithms for CVaR Optimization in MDPscited by 98
- 2019Being Optimistic to Be Conservative: Quickly Learning a CVaR Policycited by 63
- 2017How Should a Robot Assess Risk? Towards an Axiomatic Theory of Risk in Roboticscited by 57
- 2020Partial Policy Iteration for L1-Robust Markov Decision Processescited by 49
- 2023An Analysis of Quantile Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 30
7 more
- 2023On Dynamic Programming Decompositions of Static Risk Measures in Markov Decision Processescited by 17
- 2021Risk-averse autonomous systems: A brief history and recent developments from the perspective of optimal controlcited by 12
- 2023An Alternative to Variance: Gini Deviation for Risk-averse Policy Gradientcited by 12
- 2020Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Motion Control for Collision Avoidance Using Conditional Value-at-Riskcited by 8
- 2021Prospect-theoretic Q-learningcited by 6
- 2016Quantile Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2022Risk-Sensitive Optimal Execution via a Conditional Value-at-Risk Objectivecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025Planning and Learning in Average Risk-aware MDPscited by 2
- 2025Risk-Averse Total-Reward Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Boosting CVaR Policy Optimization with Quantile Gradientscited by 0
- 2026Reward Redistribution for CVaR MDPs using a Bellman Operator on L-infinitycited by 0
- 2026Stochastic Minimum-Cost Reach-Avoid Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Online Policy Evaluation for MDPs with Dynamic UBSR Measurescited by 0
- 2026Online Policy Evaluation for MDPs with Dynamic UBSR Measures25 Jul 2026
- 2026Stochastic Minimum-Cost Reach-Avoid Reinforcement Learning12 May 2026
- 2026Reward Redistribution for CVaR MDPs using a Bellman Operator on L-infinity3 Feb 2026
- 2026Boosting CVaR Policy Optimization with Quantile Gradients29 Jan 2026
- 2025Risk-Averse Total-Reward Reinforcement Learning26 Jun 2025
- 2025Planning and Learning in Average Risk-aware MDPs22 Mar 2025