mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cognitively Diverse Multiple-Choice Question Generation: A Hybrid Multi-Agent Framework with Large Language Models

arXiv 2602.03704 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Educational agents and math problem solving

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have made automated multiple-choice question (MCQ) generation increasingly feasible; however, reliably producing items that satisfy controlled cognitive demands remains a challenge. To address this gap, we introduce ReQUESTA, a hybrid, multi-agent framework for generating cognitively diverse MCQs that systematically target text-based, inferential, and main idea comprehension. ReQUESTA decomposes MCQ authoring into specialized subtasks and coordinates LLM-powered agents with rule-based components to support planning, controlled generation, iterative evaluation, and post-processing. We evaluated the framework in a large-scale reading comprehension study using academic expository texts, comparing ReQUESTA-generated MCQs with those produced by a single-pass GPT-5 zero-shot baseline. Psychometric analyses of learner responses assessed item difficulty and discrimination, while expert raters evaluated question quality across multiple dimensions, including topic relevance and distractor quality. Results showed that ReQUESTA-generated items were consistently more challenging, more discriminative, and more strongly aligned with overall reading comprehension performance. Expert evaluations further indicated stronger alignment with central concepts and superior distractor linguistic consistency and semantic plausibility, particularly for inferential questions. These findings demonstrate that hybrid, agentic orchestration can systematically improve the reliability and controllability of LLM-based generation, highlighting workflow design as a key lever for structured artifact generation beyond single-pass prompting.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2026.

Builds on

18 of 65 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  4. 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 656
  5. 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
  6. 2023Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaborationcited by 246
  7. 2023Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysiscited by 195
  8. 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlookcited by 185
  9. 2025OctoTools: An Agentic Framework with Extensible Tools for Complex Reasoningcited by 69
  10. 2023Applying Large Language Models and Chain-of-Thought for Automatic Scoringcited by 68
  11. 2024Automated Educational Question Generation at Different Bloom's Skill Levels using Large Language Models: Strategies and Evaluationcited by 29
  12. 2022Multiple-Choice Question Generation: Towards an Automated Assessment Frameworkcited by 23
6 more
  1. 2023Scalable Educational Question Generation with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 19
  2. 2023Distractor generation for multiple-choice questions with predictive prompting and large language modelscited by 15
  3. 2024Enhancing Distractor Generation for Multiple-Choice Questions with Retrieval Augmented Pretraining and Knowledge Graph Integrationcited by 11
  4. 2024Math Multiple Choice Question Generation via Human-Large Language Model Collaborationcited by 9
  5. 2021Automated question generation and question answering from Turkish textscited by 3
  6. 2023Automating question generation from educational textcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Generating AI Literacy MCQs: A Multi-Agent LLM Approach
  2. 2024The Future of Learning in the Age of Generative AI: Automated Question Generation and Assessment with Large Language Models
  3. 2026CODE-GEN: A Human-in-the-Loop RAG-Based Agentic AI System for Multiple-Choice Question Generation
  4. 2025FactGuard: Leveraging Multi-Agent Systems to Generate Answerable and Unanswerable Questions for Enhanced Long-Context LLM Extraction
  5. 2024Rethinking Generative Large Language Model Evaluation for Semantic Comprehension
  6. 2026A Tri-Agent Framework for Evaluating and Aligning Question Clarification Capabilities of Large Language Models
  7. 2026KNIGHT: Knowledge Graph-Driven Multiple-Choice Question Generation with Adaptive Hardness Calibration
  8. 2025Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework For Math Problem Generation