Segment to Focus: Guiding Latent Action Models in the Presence of Distractors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Latent action models (LAMs) offer a promising path to pre-training embodied agents on large amounts of action-free video. They infer latent actions between consecutive observations that can later be decoded to ground-truth actions using a small number of labels. However, recent work has shown that this recipe fails in the presence of action-correlated visual distractors common in real-world video, such as dynamic backgrounds, camera shake, or other moving objects. In these scenarios, the standard reconstruction objective drives latent actions to encode exogenous motion instead of agent-controlled dynamics, resulting in policies that underperform when fine-tuned. We observe, however, that endogenous and exogenous factors are typically spatially separated in pixel space: control-relevant change is concentrated on the agent, while distractor motion occurs elsewhere. We exploit this observation by restricting the reconstruction objective to agent pixels, forcing latent actions to explain agent-controlled dynamics rather than exogenous ones. We call this method MaskLAM; it obtains the agent mask zero-shot from off-the-shelf segmentation foundation models (e.g., SAM) and requires no architectural changes, auxiliary losses, or action labels during pre-training. Across two continuous-control benchmarks (Distracting Control Suite, Distracting Meta-World), MaskLAM reduces normalized linear-probe MSE by up to 3.51× and improves normalized return by up to 4.97× over LAPO, while narrowing the gap to LAOM-Labels, which relies on ground-truth action supervision.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
33 of 51 references.
References · 33
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
- 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 942
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
- 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 865
21 more
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2024Genie: Generative Interactive Environmentscited by 706
- 2018Behavioral Cloning from Observationcited by 482
- 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 368
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2024Latent Action Pretraining from Videoscited by 302
- 2024Video Prediction Policy: A Generalist Robot Policy with Predictive Visual Representationscited by 279
- 2020Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Componentscited by 188
- 2023Learning to Act without Actionscited by 116
- 2022From Play to Policy: Conditional Behavior Generation from Uncurated Robot Datacited by 103
- 2018Imitating Latent Policies from Observationcited by 101
- 2021The Distracting Control Suite -- A Challenging Benchmark for Reinforcement Learning from Pixelscited by 97
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with Videos: Combining Offline Observations with Interactioncited by 80
- 2024Moto: Latent Motion Token as the Bridging Language for Learning Robot Manipulation from Videoscited by 65
- 2022Guaranteed Discovery of Control-Endogenous Latent States with Multi-Step Inverse Modelscited by 42
- 2025Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractorscited by 40
- 2025What Do Latent Action Models Actually Learn?cited by 30
- 2025LAOF: Robust Latent Action Learning with Optical Flow Constraintscited by 12
- 2024AD3: Implicit Action is the Key for World Models to Distinguish the Diverse Visual Distractorscited by 10
- 2024Multistep Inverse Is Not All You Needcited by 10
- 2025Object-Centric Latent Action Learningcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Causally Debiased Latent Action Model for Embodied Action Conditioned World Modelscited by 3
- 2026Latent Actions from Factorized Transition Effects under Agent Ambiguitycited by 0
- 2026Dueling World Models: Advantage-Style Action Channels for Common-Mode Distractor Rejectioncited by 0
- 2026What Moves? Localized Motion Representations for Compositional Scene Controlcited by 0
- 2026Less Language, More Latents: Annotation-Efficient VLAs for Drivingcited by 0
- 2026Less Language, More Latents: Annotation-Efficient VLAs for Driving23 Sep 2026
- 2026What Moves? Localized Motion Representations for Compositional Scene Control3 Sep 2026
- 2026Dueling World Models: Advantage-Style Action Channels for Common-Mode Distractor Rejection7 Aug 2026
- 2026Causally Debiased Latent Action Model for Embodied Action Conditioned World Models10 Jul 2026
- 2026Latent Actions from Factorized Transition Effects under Agent Ambiguity29 Jun 2026