mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Segment to Focus: Guiding Latent Action Models in the Presence of Distractors

arXiv 2602.02259 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Latent action models (LAMs) offer a promising path to pre-training embodied agents on large amounts of action-free video. They infer latent actions between consecutive observations that can later be decoded to ground-truth actions using a small number of labels. However, recent work has shown that this recipe fails in the presence of action-correlated visual distractors common in real-world video, such as dynamic backgrounds, camera shake, or other moving objects. In these scenarios, the standard reconstruction objective drives latent actions to encode exogenous motion instead of agent-controlled dynamics, resulting in policies that underperform when fine-tuned. We observe, however, that endogenous and exogenous factors are typically spatially separated in pixel space: control-relevant change is concentrated on the agent, while distractor motion occurs elsewhere. We exploit this observation by restricting the reconstruction objective to agent pixels, forcing latent actions to explain agent-controlled dynamics rather than exogenous ones. We call this method MaskLAM; it obtains the agent mask zero-shot from off-the-shelf segmentation foundation models (e.g., SAM) and requires no architectural changes, auxiliary losses, or action labels during pre-training. Across two continuous-control benchmarks (Distracting Control Suite, Distracting Meta-World), MaskLAM reduces normalized linear-probe MSE by up to 3.51× and improves normalized return by up to 4.97× over LAPO, while narrowing the gap to LAOM-Labels, which relies on ground-truth action supervision.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.

Builds on

33 of 51 references.

References · 33

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  4. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  5. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  6. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
  7. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
  8. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  9. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  10. 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 942
  11. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
  12. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 865
21 more
  1. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  2. 2024Genie: Generative Interactive Environmentscited by 706
  3. 2018Behavioral Cloning from Observationcited by 482
  4. 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 368
  5. 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
  6. 2024Latent Action Pretraining from Videoscited by 302
  7. 2024Video Prediction Policy: A Generalist Robot Policy with Predictive Visual Representationscited by 279
  8. 2020Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Componentscited by 188
  9. 2023Learning to Act without Actionscited by 116
  10. 2022From Play to Policy: Conditional Behavior Generation from Uncurated Robot Datacited by 103
  11. 2018Imitating Latent Policies from Observationcited by 101
  12. 2021The Distracting Control Suite -- A Challenging Benchmark for Reinforcement Learning from Pixelscited by 97
  13. 2020Reinforcement Learning with Videos: Combining Offline Observations with Interactioncited by 80
  14. 2024Moto: Latent Motion Token as the Bridging Language for Learning Robot Manipulation from Videoscited by 65
  15. 2022Guaranteed Discovery of Control-Endogenous Latent States with Multi-Step Inverse Modelscited by 42
  16. 2025Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractorscited by 40
  17. 2025What Do Latent Action Models Actually Learn?cited by 30
  18. 2025LAOF: Robust Latent Action Learning with Optical Flow Constraintscited by 12
  19. 2024AD3: Implicit Action is the Key for World Models to Distinguish the Diverse Visual Distractorscited by 10
  20. 2024Multistep Inverse Is Not All You Needcited by 10
  21. 2025Object-Centric Latent Action Learningcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.