mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ESSAM: A Novel Competitive Evolution Strategies Approach to Reinforcement Learning for Memory Efficient LLMs Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2602.01003 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a key training step for improving mathematical reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but it often has high GPU memory usage, which makes it hard to use in settings with limited resources. To reduce these issues, we propose Evolution Strategies with Sharpness-Aware Maximization (ESSAM), a full parameter fine-tuning framework that tightly combines the zero-order search in parameter space from Evolution Strategies (ES) with the Sharpness-Aware Maximization (SAM) to improve generalization. We conduct fine-tuning experiments on the mainstream mathematica reasoning task GSM8K. The results show that ESSAM achieves an average accuracy of 78.27% across all models and its overall performance is comparable to RL methods. It surpasses classic RL algorithm PPO with an accuracy of 77.72% and is comparable to GRPO with an accuracy of 78.34%, and even surpassing them on some models. Further generalization experiments show that the models trained with ESSAM exhibit stronger generalization ability. Their average performance achieves the best results on 5 out of 6 datasets, indicating that ESSAM can effectively improve the generalization performance of fine-tuned models. In terms of GPU memory usage, ESSAM reduces the average GPU memory usage by 18× compared to PPO and by 10× compared to GRPO, achieving an extremely low GPU memory usage. In addition, we design an accelerated variant of ESSAM, which achieves nearly a twofold speedup while maintaining the same GPU memory usage as ESSAM, and attains an average accuracy of 78.02% across all models, outperforming PPO. Code: https://github.com/szs777/ESSAM

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Evolution Strategies at Scale: LLM Fine-Tuning Beyond Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regression
  3. 2025On Predictability of Reinforcement Learning Dynamics for Large Language Models
  4. 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
  5. 2026Back to Basics: Revisiting Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning via Generative Probabilities
  6. 2025A Practical Two-Stage Recipe for Mathematical LLMs: Maximizing Accuracy with SFT and Efficiency with Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Exploration-Driven Optimization for Test-Time Large Language Model Reasoning
  8. 2025Diversity-Aware Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Reasoning