A Practical Two-Stage Recipe for Mathematical LLMs: Maximizing Accuracy with SFT and Efficiency with Reinforcement Learning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Enhancing the mathematical reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a pivotal challenge in advancing AI capabilities. While Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) are the dominant training paradigms, a systematic methodology for combining them to maximize both accuracy and efficiency remains largely unexplored. This paper introduces a practical and effective training recipe that strategically integrates extended SFT with RL from online inference (GRPO). We posit that these methods play complementary, not competing, roles: a prolonged SFT phase first pushes the model's accuracy to its limits, after which a GRPO phase dramatically improves token efficiency while preserving this peak performance. Our experiments reveal that extending SFT for as many as 10 epochs is crucial for performance breakthroughs, and that the primary role of GRPO in this framework is to optimize solution length. The efficacy of our recipe is rigorously validated through top-tier performance on challenging benchmarks, including a high rank among over 2,200 teams in the strictly leak-free AI Mathematical Olympiad (AIMO). This work provides the community with a battle-tested blueprint for developing state-of-the-art mathematical reasoners that are both exceptionally accurate and practically efficient. To ensure full reproducibility and empower future research, we will open-source our entire framework, including all code, model checkpoints, and training configurations at https://github.com/analokmaus/kaggle-aimo2-fast-math-r1.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025RL Squeezes, SFT Expands: A Comparative Study of Reasoning LLMscited by 34
- 2026Scientific Graphics Program Synthesis via Dual Self-Consistency Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2025Incorporating Self-Rewriting into Large Language Model Reasoning Reinforcementcited by 3
- 2025Rethinking Expert Trajectory Utilization in LLM Post-training for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 2
- 2026Bridging SFT and RL: Dynamic Policy Optimization for Robust Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026Bidirectional Curriculum Generation: A Multi-Agent Framework for Data-Efficient Mathematical Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Bridging SFT and RL: Dynamic Policy Optimization for Robust Reasoning10 Apr 2026
- 2026Scientific Graphics Program Synthesis via Dual Self-Consistency Reinforcement Learning7 Apr 2026
- 2026Bidirectional Curriculum Generation: A Multi-Agent Framework for Data-Efficient Mathematical Reasoning5 Mar 2026
- 2025Rethinking Expert Trajectory Utilization in LLM Post-training for Mathematical Reasoning12 Dec 2025
- 2025Incorporating Self-Rewriting into Large Language Model Reasoning Reinforcement20 Nov 2025
- 2025RL Squeezes, SFT Expands: A Comparative Study of Reasoning LLMs25 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Scalpel vs. Hammer: GRPO Amplifies Existing Capabilities, SFT Replaces Them
- 2025JT-Math: A Multi-Stage Framework for Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Boosting Accuracy and Efficiency of Budget Forcing in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025Beyond Two-Stage Training: Cooperative SFT and RL for LLM Reasoning
- 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models
- 2025Critique-GRPO: Advancing LLM Reasoning with Natural Language and Numerical Feedback
- 2025Scaling Up RL: Unlocking Diverse Reasoning in LLMs via Prolonged Training
- 2025Token-Efficient RL for LLM Reasoning