mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DISPO: Enhancing Training Efficiency and Stability in Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv 2602.00983 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models particularly in mathematics. Current approaches in this domain present a clear trade-off: PPO-style methods (e.g., GRPO/DAPO) offer training stability but exhibit slow learning trajectories due to their trust-region constraints on policy updates, while REINFORCE-style approaches (e.g., CISPO) demonstrate improved learning efficiency but suffer from performance instability as they clip importance sampling weights while still permitting non-zero gradients outside the trust-region. To address these limitations, we introduce DISPO, a simple yet effective REINFORCE-style algorithm that decouples the up-clipping and down-clipping of importance sampling weights for correct and incorrect responses, yielding four controllable policy update regimes. Through targeted ablations, we uncover how each regime impacts training: for correct responses, weights >1 increase the average token entropy (i.e., exploration) while weights <1 decrease it (i.e., distillation) -- both beneficial but causing gradual performance degradation when excessive. For incorrect responses, overly restrictive clipping triggers sudden performance collapse through repetitive outputs (when weights >1) or vanishing response lengths (when weights <1). By separately tuning these four clipping parameters, DISPO maintains the exploration-distillation balance while preventing catastrophic failures, achieving 61.04% on AIME'24 (vs. 55.42% CISPO and 50.21% DAPO) with similar gains across various benchmarks and models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.

Builds on

17 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning2 Jun
  2. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
  3. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
  4. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov

Other references · 13

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  6. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  7. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  8. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
  9. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 699
  10. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
  11. 2019Analysing Mathematical Reasoning Abilities of Neural Modelscited by 331
  12. 2017Emergence of Locomotion Behaviours in Rich Environmentscited by 159
1 more
  1. 2025Asymmetric REINFORCE for off-Policy Reinforcement Learning: Balancing positive and negative rewardscited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Comparative Analysis and Parametric Tuning of PPO, GRPO, and DAPO for LLM Reasoning Enhancement
  2. 2024Improving Multi-Step Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models with Direct Advantage Policy Optimization
  3. 2026PrAg-PO: Prompt Augmented Policy Optimization for Robust and Diverse Mathematical Reasoning
  4. 2025A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforce
  5. 2026Learning from Failures: Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization with Verifiable Rewards
  6. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example
  7. 2026Buffer Matters: Unleashing the Power of Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning in Large Language Model Reasoning
  8. 2026Learning to Use Tools: Reinforcement Learning for Tool-Integrated Mathematical Reasoning