FoundationalASSIST: An Educational Dataset for Foundational Knowledge Tracing and Pedagogical Grounding of LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Can Large Language Models understand how students learn? As LLMs are deployed for adaptive testing and personalized tutoring, this question becomes urgent -- yet we cannot answer it with existing resources. Current educational datasets provide only question identifiers and binary correctness labels, rendering them opaque to LLMs that reason in natural language. We address this gap with FoundationalASSIST, the first English educational dataset providing the complete information needed for research on LLMs in education: full question text, actual student responses (not just right/wrong), records of which wrong answers students chose, and alignment to Common Core K-12 standards. These 1.7 million interactions from 5,000 students enable research directions that were previously impossible to pursue, from fine-tuning student models to analyzing misconception patterns. To demonstrate the dataset's utility, we evaluate four frontier models (GPT-OSS-120B, Llama-3.3-70B, Qwen3-Next-80B variants) on two complementary task families: Knowledge Tracing, testing whether LLMs can predict student performance on questions, and the exact answer a student will give; and Pedagogical Grounding, testing whether LLMs understand the properties that make assessment items effective. Our evaluation reveals significant gaps in current LLM capabilities. Every model barely achieves a trivial baseline on knowledge tracing. All models fall below random chance on item discrimination, indicating that LLMs do not understand what makes one problem more diagnostic than another. Models do show competence at judging relative difficulty (up to 68.6%), but this partial success only highlights the gaps elsewhere. These results establish that substantial advances are needed before LLMs can reliably support personalized learning at scale. We release FoundationalASSIST to support progress on these foundational challenges.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.
Builds on
24 of 56 references.
References · 24
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
- 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 332
- 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 243
- 2020Context-Aware Attentive Knowledge Tracingcited by 174
- 2019A Self-Attentive model for Knowledge Tracingcited by 172
- 2016Dynamic Key-Value Memory Networks for Knowledge Tracingcited by 171
- 2019EdNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Dataset in Educationcited by 108
- 2020Instructions and Guide for Diagnostic Questions: The NeurIPS 2020 Education Challengecited by 64
- 2023CLASS: A Design Framework for building Intelligent Tutoring Systems based on Learning Science principlescited by 48
12 more
- 2024Exploring Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues using LLMscited by 46
- 2024LearnLM: Improving Gemini for Learningcited by 25
- 2020qDKT: Question-centric Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 24
- 2025SMART: Simulated Students Aligned with Item Response Theory for Question Difficulty Predictioncited by 23
- 2024Pedagogical Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2024CLST: Cold-Start Mitigation in Knowledge Tracing by Aligning a Generative Language Model as a Students' Knowledge Tracercited by 17
- 2024LLM-based Cognitive Models of Students with Misconceptionscited by 16
- 2024Exploring Automated Distractor Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions via Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025Reasoning and Sampling-Augmented MCQ Difficulty Prediction via LLMscited by 14
- 2024Automated Generation and Tagging of Knowledge Components from Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 13
- 2021Option Tracing: Beyond Correctness Analysis in Knowledge Tracingcited by 11
- 2025Do LLMs Make Mistakes Like Students? Exploring Natural Alignment between Language Models and Human Error Patternscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Hey Chat, Can You Teach Me? Structuring Socratic Dialogue for Human Learning in the Wildcited by 1
- 2026StudentSim: Training LLM-based Student Simulatorscited by 1
- 2026Circuit Complexity of Hierarchical Knowledge Tracing and Implications for Log-Precision Transformerscited by 0
- 2026Can a System-One LLM Perform Knowledge Tracing When Few or No Learners Are Logged?cited by 0
- 2026Can a System-One LLM Perform Knowledge Tracing When Few or No Learners Are Logged?8 Oct 2026
- 2026StudentSim: Training LLM-based Student Simulators1 Sep 2026
- 2026Hey Chat, Can You Teach Me? Structuring Socratic Dialogue for Human Learning in the Wild10 Jun 2026
- 2026Circuit Complexity of Hierarchical Knowledge Tracing and Implications for Log-Precision Transformers25 Mar 2026