Learning Incentive Structures for Cooperative Resilience in Multi-Agent Systems under Social Dilemmas
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent social dilemmas, such as the tragedy of the commons, capture settings where individual incentives conflict with collective well-being, making these systems highly vulnerable to collapse under disruptions. In this context, this work studies cooperative resilience, understood as the system-level ability to maintain collective well-being under perturbations through adaptive agent behavior. We propose a framework for learning incentive structures aligned with collective well-being in multi-agent reinforcement learning systems, where reward functions shape individual decision-making and collective behavior. A resilience metric is used to score and rank agent trajectories, allowing the inference of reward functions that promote resilient collective behavior. These inferred reward functions are integrated into the multi-agent reinforcement learning process to shape agent interactions in social dilemma settings. The approach is evaluated in resource-sharing environments subject to disruptions, using three incentive structures: individual incentives, resilience-aligned incentives, and a hybrid incentive structure that combines both individual and collective components. The results show that the hybrid incentive structure promotes sustained collective behavior, reduces collapse events associated with resource depletion, and preserves system performance under disruption. These findings highlight the role of incentive design as a mechanism for promoting resilient collective behavior and provide a computational framework for multi-agent social dilemmas under disruptions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
22 of 42 references.
References · 22
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
- 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progresscited by 294
- 2019Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observationscited by 256
- 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
- 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 168
- 2025Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AIcited by 155
- 2018Inequity aversion improves cooperation in intertemporal social dilemmascited by 106
- 2017A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriationcited by 68
- 2020Learning to Incentivize Other Learning Agentscited by 55
- 2022Melting Pot 2.0cited by 40
- 2021A learning agent that acquires social norms from public sanctions in decentralized multi-agent settingscited by 24
- 2025Will Systems of LLM Agents Cooperate: An Investigation into a Social Dilemmacited by 24
10 more
- 2023Towards Theoretical Understanding of Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2024Multi-Agent, Human-Agent and Beyond: A Survey on Cooperation in Social Dilemmascited by 12
- 2024Cooperative Resilience in Artificial Intelligence Multiagent Systemscited by 8
- 2022Inverse Game Theory for Stackelberg Games: the Blessing of Bounded Rationalitycited by 5
- 2021The social dilemma in artificial intelligence development and why we have to solve itcited by 4
- 2024Explaining Decisions of Agents in Mixed-Motive Gamescited by 4
- 2025Efficient Inverse Multiagent Learningcited by 3
- 2021Collaboration Promotes Group Resilience in Multi-Agent RLcited by 2
- 2023Understanding the World to Solve Social Dilemmas Using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2024Inverse Concave-Utility Reinforcement Learning is Inverse Game Theorycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.