mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Defining Operational Conditions for Safety-Critical AI-Based Systems from Data

arXiv 2601.22118 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been on the rise in many domains, including numerous safety-critical applications. However, for complex systems in the real world, defining the underlying environmental conditions in which the AI-based system must operate---the Operational Design Domain (ODD)---is extremely challenging. This often results in an incomplete description of the ODD, which contrasts with the requirements of many domains for certifying AI-based systems. Traditionally, the ODD is created in the early stages of the development process, drawing on sophisticated expert knowledge and related standards. This paper presents a novel method for defining the ODD a posteriori from previously collected data using a multidimensional kernel-based representation. This approach is validated through both synthetic benchmarks and a real-world aviation use case. Moreover, the paper defines similarity of two ODDs if they generate the same outputs up to Lebesgue-null input sets and proves convergence in volume of the calibrated representation under the stated assumptions. The novel, safety-by-design, deterministic kernel-based ODD representation is derived fully automatically, given documented assurance inputs, permutation-stable, bounded by construction, and, under affine-equivariant per-dimension normalization, invariant to the choice of units. Utilizing the proposed ODD representation supports future certification of data-driven, safety-critical AI-based systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.

Builds on

18 of 82 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
  2. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  3. 2024The Faiss librarycited by 370
  4. 2018Deep Neural Network Compression for Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systemscited by 58
  5. 2021How to Certify Machine Learning Based Safety-critical Systems? A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 36
  6. 2019Guaranteeing Safety for Neural Network-Based Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systemscited by 26
  7. 2021Learning with Density Matrices and Random Featurescited by 17
  8. 2021White Paper Machine Learning in Certified Systemscited by 15
  9. 2019Autonomous Vehicles Meet the Physical World: RSS, Variability, Uncertainty, and Proving Safety (Expanded Version)cited by 10
  10. 2024How to design a dataset compliant with an ML-based system ODD?cited by 6
  11. 2021Generating Probabilistic Safety Guarantees for Neural Network Controllerscited by 4
  12. 2023Data-centric Operational Design Domain Characterization for Machine Learning-based Aeronautical Productscited by 4
6 more
  1. 2024Safe and Reliable Training of Learning-Based Aerospace Controllerscited by 4
  2. 2025LeRAAT: LLM-Enabled Real-Time Aviation Advisory Toolcited by 4
  3. 2024Formalization of Operational Domain and Operational Design Domain for Automated Vehiclescited by 3
  4. 2022Fast Kernel Density Estimation with Density Matrices and Random Fourier Featurescited by 2
  5. 2024Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunitiescited by 2
  6. 2025One Stack, Diverse Vehicles: Checking Safe Portability of Automated Driving Softwarecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.