Defining Operational Conditions for Safety-Critical AI-Based Systems from Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been on the rise in many domains, including numerous safety-critical applications. However, for complex systems in the real world, defining the underlying environmental conditions in which the AI-based system must operate---the Operational Design Domain (ODD)---is extremely challenging. This often results in an incomplete description of the ODD, which contrasts with the requirements of many domains for certifying AI-based systems. Traditionally, the ODD is created in the early stages of the development process, drawing on sophisticated expert knowledge and related standards. This paper presents a novel method for defining the ODD a posteriori from previously collected data using a multidimensional kernel-based representation. This approach is validated through both synthetic benchmarks and a real-world aviation use case. Moreover, the paper defines similarity of two ODDs if they generate the same outputs up to Lebesgue-null input sets and proves convergence in volume of the calibrated representation under the stated assumptions. The novel, safety-by-design, deterministic kernel-based ODD representation is derived fully automatically, given documented assurance inputs, permutation-stable, bounded by construction, and, under affine-equivariant per-dimension normalization, invariant to the choice of units. Utilizing the proposed ODD representation supports future certification of data-driven, safety-critical AI-based systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
18 of 82 references.
References · 18
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2024The Faiss librarycited by 370
- 2018Deep Neural Network Compression for Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systemscited by 58
- 2021How to Certify Machine Learning Based Safety-critical Systems? A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 36
- 2019Guaranteeing Safety for Neural Network-Based Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systemscited by 26
- 2021Learning with Density Matrices and Random Featurescited by 17
- 2021White Paper Machine Learning in Certified Systemscited by 15
- 2019Autonomous Vehicles Meet the Physical World: RSS, Variability, Uncertainty, and Proving Safety (Expanded Version)cited by 10
- 2024How to design a dataset compliant with an ML-based system ODD?cited by 6
- 2021Generating Probabilistic Safety Guarantees for Neural Network Controllerscited by 4
- 2023Data-centric Operational Design Domain Characterization for Machine Learning-based Aeronautical Productscited by 4
6 more
- 2024Safe and Reliable Training of Learning-Based Aerospace Controllerscited by 4
- 2025LeRAAT: LLM-Enabled Real-Time Aviation Advisory Toolcited by 4
- 2024Formalization of Operational Domain and Operational Design Domain for Automated Vehiclescited by 3
- 2022Fast Kernel Density Estimation with Density Matrices and Random Fourier Featurescited by 2
- 2024Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunitiescited by 2
- 2025One Stack, Diverse Vehicles: Checking Safe Portability of Automated Driving Softwarecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.