mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generating Probabilistic Safety Guarantees for Neural Network Controllers

arXiv 2103.01203 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2021cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks serve as effective controllers in a variety of complex settings due to their ability to represent expressive policies. The complex nature of neural networks, however, makes their output difficult to verify and predict, which limits their use in safety-critical applications. While simulations provide insight into the performance of neural network controllers, they are not enough to guarantee that the controller will perform safely in all scenarios. To address this problem, recent work has focused on formal methods to verify properties of neural network outputs. For neural network controllers, we can use a dynamics model to determine the output properties that must hold for the controller to operate safely. In this work, we develop a method to use the results from neural network verification tools to provide probabilistic safety guarantees on a neural network controller. We develop an adaptive verification approach to efficiently generate an overapproximation of the neural network policy. Next, we modify the traditional formulation of Markov decision process (MDP) model checking to provide guarantees on the overapproximated policy given a stochastic dynamics model. Finally, we incorporate techniques in state abstraction to reduce overapproximation error during the model checking process. We show that our method is able to generate meaningful probabilistic safety guarantees for aircraft collision avoidance neural networks that are loosely inspired by Airborne Collision Avoidance System X (ACAS X), a family of collision avoidance systems that formulates the problem as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP).

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2021.

Builds on

16 of 37 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  2. 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  3. 2018Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervalscited by 185
  4. 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extractioncited by 177
  5. 2018Verisig: verifying safety properties of hybrid systems with neural network controllerscited by 84
  6. 2018Deep Neural Network Compression for Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systemscited by 58
  7. 2018Learning Finite State Representations of Recurrent Policy Networkscited by 37
  8. 2019ReachNN: Reachability Analysis of Neural-Network Controlled Systemscited by 26
  9. 2019Guaranteeing Safety for Neural Network-Based Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systemscited by 26
  10. 2018Reachable Set Estimation and Safety Verification for Piecewise Linear Systems with Neural Network Controllerscited by 15
  11. 2018Reachability Analysis and Safety Verification for Neural Network Control Systemscited by 12
  12. 2019A Reachability Method for Verifying Dynamical Systems with Deep Neural Network Controllerscited by 11
4 more
  1. 2019Verifying Aircraft Collision Avoidance Neural Networks Through Linear Approximations of Safe Regionscited by 9
  2. 2020Safety Verification of Neural Network Controlled Systemscited by 9
  3. 2020Point-Based Methods for Model Checking in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processescited by 8
  4. 2018Reachable Set Estimation and Verification for Neural Network Models of Nonlinear Dynamic Systemscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.