mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

One-Step Bellman Alignment Enables Provably Efficient Transfer in Online RL

arXiv 2601.21924 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study online transfer reinforcement learning (RL) in episodic Markov decision processes, where experience from related source tasks is available during learning on a target task. A fundamental difficulty is that task similarity is typically defined in terms of rewards or transitions, whereas online RL algorithms operate on Bellman regression targets. As a result, naively reusing source Bellman updates introduces systematic bias and invalidates regret guarantees. We identify one-step Bellman alignment as the correct abstraction for transfer in online RL and propose re-weighted targeting (RWT), an operator-level correction that retargets continuation values and compensates for transition mismatch via a change of measure. RWT reduces task mismatch to a fixed one-step correction and enables statistically sound reuse of source data. This alignment yields a two-stage RWT Q-learning framework that separates variance reduction from bias correction. Under RKHS function approximation, we establish regret bounds that scale with the complexity of the task shift rather than the target MDP. We further show the required density ratios admit a constructive RKHS estimator with finite-sample guarantees, and empirically validate robustness to estimated and mis-specified ratios. Empirical results in both tabular and neural network settings demonstrate consistent improvements over single-task learning and na"ive pooling, highlighting Bellman alignment as a model-agnostic transfer principle for online RL.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.

Builds on

9 of 16 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 520
  2. 2013Sample Complexity of Multi-task Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
  3. 2021Near-optimal Representation Learning for Linear Bandits and Linear RLcited by 45
  4. 2022Provable Benefits of Representational Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 38
  5. 2023Kernelized Reinforcement Learning with Order Optimal Regret Boundscited by 20
  6. 2024Kernel-Based Function Approximation for Average Reward Reinforcement Learning: An Optimist No-Regret Algorithmcited by 6
  7. 2024Data-Driven Knowledge Transfer in Batch Q^* Learningcited by 4
  8. 2025Transfer Faster, Price Smarter: Minimax Dynamic Pricing under Cross-Market Preference Shiftcited by 2
  9. 2025Prior-Aligned Meta-RL: Thompson Sampling with Learned Priors and Guarantees in Finite-Horizon MDPscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Can RLHF be More Efficient with Imperfect Reward Models? A Policy Coverage Perspective
  2. 2026Unifying Stable Optimization and Reference Regularization in RLHF
  3. 2025Learning to Trust Bellman Updates: Selective State-Adaptive Regularization for Offline RL
  4. 2025Provably Efficient Online RLHF with One-Pass Reward Modeling
  5. 2024Towards Sample-Efficiency and Generalization of Transfer and Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Literature Review
  6. 2024Hybrid Transfer Reinforcement Learning: Provable Sample Efficiency from Shifted-Dynamics Data
  7. 2026Target-Aligned Bellman Backup for Cross-domain Offline Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2024Solving the Inverse Alignment Problem for Efficient RLHF