Learning to Hand Off: Provably Convergent Workflow Learning under Interface Constraints
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
We study workflow learning in a setting where specialized agents hand off control through a shared artifact, each agent observes only a local function of that artifact and its own private state, and no centralized learner accesses joint trajectories -- the operating regime of multi-agent LLM pipelines that span organizational, vendor, or trust boundaries. We formalize this regime as an interface-constrained semi-Markov decision process (IC-SMDP), whose decision epochs occur at handoff times, and design IC-Q, an asynchronous decentralized Q-learning algorithm in which cross-agent coordination at every handoff is exactly one scalar. Our main result is a finite-sample bound for neural IC-Q that decomposes into three independently controllable error sources: neural function-approximation error, interface representation gap, and a mixing-time residual, under the random option-duration discount. Establishing this bound requires lifting the approximate information state (AIS) framework from single-agent primitive-step MDPs to multi-agent SMDPs and controlling Markovian noise under random duration, neither of which has been done in prior work. To our knowledge this is the first finite-sample guarantee for neural Q-learning under decentralized partial observability. Four experiments: a controlled synthetic IC-SMDP that validates the bound term-by-term, multi-LLM mathematical reasoning, multi-agent routing, and multi-agent CPU programming, show that IC-Q matches a centralized oracle without any agent observing joint trajectories, with each of the three error sources scaling along its corresponding axis as the bound predicts.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.
Builds on
30 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Difficulty-Aware Agentic Orchestration for Query-Specific Multi-Agent Workflows14 Sep
- 2024WorkflowLLM: Enhancing Workflow Orchestration Capability of Large Language Models8 Nov
- 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generation14 Oct
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation16 Aug
Other references · 26
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 485
- 2016The Option-Critic Architecturecited by 448
- 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systemscited by 407
- 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 401
- 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 261
- 2013The Complexity of Decentralized Control of Markov Decision Processescited by 231
- 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 229
- 2025AgentNet: Decentralized Evolutionary Coordination for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 90
14 more
- 2020Approximate information state for approximate planning and reinforcement learning in partially observed systemscited by 70
- 2019A Finite-Time Analysis of Q-Learning with Neural Network Function Approximationcited by 47
- 2021Convergence of Finite Memory Q-Learning for POMDPs and Near Optimality of Learned Policies under Filter Stabilitycited by 22
- 2019Neural Temporal-Difference and Q-Learning Provably Converge to Global Optimacited by 20
- 2024Agent-state based policies in POMDPs: Beyond belief-state MDPscited by 9
- 2021Common Information based Approximate State Representations in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2024Periodic agent-state based Q-learning for POMDPscited by 6
- 2024Data-Driven Knowledge Transfer in Batch Q^* Learningcited by 4
- 2025Deep Transfer Q-Learning for Offline Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2025Transfer Faster, Price Smarter: Minimax Dynamic Pricing under Cross-Market Preference Shiftcited by 2
- 2025Prior-Aligned Meta-RL: Thompson Sampling with Learned Priors and Guarantees in Finite-Horizon MDPscited by 2
- 2025High-Dimensional Linear Bandits under Stochastic Latent Heterogeneitycited by 1
- 2026One-Step Bellman Alignment Enables Provably Efficient Transfer in Online RLcited by 1
- 2026Transfer Learning for Contextual Joint Assortment-Pricing under Cross-Market Heterogeneitycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Learning to Compose for Cross-domain Agentic Workflow Generation
- 2026When Does Multi-Agent RL Improve LLM Workflows? Workflow, Scale, and Policy-Sharing Tradeoffs
- 2026EvoMAS: Learning Execution-Time Workflows for Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Maat: Independent Deterministic Contract-Based Governance for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows
- 2026WorkflowOps: Learning Agent Collaboration Priors for Multi-Agent Workflow Orchestration
- 2025Orchestrating Human-AI Teams: The Manager Agent as a Unifying Research Challenge
- 2026Learning What to Skip: Counterfactual Credit Assignment for Efficient Multi-Agent LLM Workflows
- 2026PACT: Privileged Trace Co-Training for Multi-Turn Tool-Use Agents