MPF-Net: Exposing High-Fidelity AI-Generated Video Forgeries via Hierarchical Manifold Deviation and Micro-Temporal Fluctuations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the rapid advancement of video generation models such as Veo and Wan, the visual quality of synthetic content has reached a level where macro-level semantic errors and temporal inconsistencies are no longer prominent. However, this does not imply that the distinction between real and cutting-edge high-fidelity fake is untraceable. We argue that AI-generated videos are essentially products of a manifold-fitting process rather than a physical recording. Consequently, the pixel composition logic of consecutive adjacent frames residual in AI videos exhibits a structured and homogenous characteristic. We term this phenomenon `Manifold Projection Fluctuations' (MPF). Driven by this insight, we propose a hierarchical dual-path framework that operates as a sequential filtering process. The first, the Static Manifold Deviation Branch, leverages the refined perceptual boundaries of Large-Scale Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) to capture residual spatial anomalies or physical violations that deviate from the natural real-world manifold (off-manifold). For the remaining high-fidelity videos that successfully reside on-manifold and evade spatial detection, we introduce the Micro-Temporal Fluctuation Branch as a secondary, fine-grained filter. By analyzing the structured MPF that persists even in visually perfect sequences, our framework ensures that forgeries are exposed regardless of whether they manifest as global real-world manifold deviations or subtle computational fingerprints.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
24 of 29 references.
References · 24
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
- 2022Expanding Language-Image Pretrained Models for General Video Recognitioncited by 320
- 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 318
- 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 315
- 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
- 2024VidProM: A Million-scale Real Prompt-Gallery Dataset for Text-to-Video Diffusion Modelscited by 124
- 2023TALL: Thumbnail Layout for Deepfake Video Detectioncited by 100
- 2021Spatiotemporal Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 88
- 2022Fusing Global and Local Features for Generalized AI-Synthesized Image Detectioncited by 88
- 2024DeMamba: AI-Generated Video Detection on Million-Scale GenVideo Benchmarkcited by 85
12 more
- 2025AI-Generated Video Detection via Perceptual Straighteningcited by 34
- 2025Physics-Driven Spatiotemporal Modeling for AI-Generated Video Detectioncited by 27
- 2024Detecting AI-Generated Video via Frame Consistencycited by 26
- 2025Skyra: AI-Generated Video Detection via Grounded Artifact Reasoningcited by 24
- 2022MINTIME: Multi-Identity Size-Invariant Video Deepfake Detectioncited by 23
- 2024Frequency Masking for Universal Deepfake Detectioncited by 23
- 2025Seeing What Matters: Generalizable AI-generated Video Detection with Forensic-Oriented Augmentationcited by 23
- 2023Detecting Generated Images by Real Images Onlycited by 20
- 2025Brought a Gun to a Knife Fight: Modern VFM Baselines Outgun Specialized Detectors on In-the-Wild AI Image Detectioncited by 10
- 2024AI-Generated Video Detection via Spatio-Temporal Anomaly Learningcited by 9
- 2025HumanSAM: Classifying Human-centric Forgery Videos in Human Spatial, Appearance, and Motion Anomalycited by 4
- 2025Leveraging Pre-Trained Visual Models for AI-Generated Video Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.