Conditional Denoising Model as a Physical Surrogate Model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Surrogate modeling for complex physical systems typically faces a trade-off between data-fitting accuracy and physical consistency. Physics-consistent approaches typically treat physical laws as soft constraints within the loss function, a strategy that frequently fails to guarantee strict adherence to the governing equations, or rely on post-processing corrections that do not intrinsically learn the underlying solution geometry. To address these limitations, we introduce the {Conditional Denoising Model (CDM)}, a generative model designed to learn the geometry of the physical manifold itself. By training the network to restore clean states from noisy ones, the model learns a vector field that points continuously towards the valid solution subspace. We introduce a time-independent formulation that transforms inference into a deterministic fixed-point iteration, effectively projecting noisy approximations onto the equilibrium manifold. Validated on a low-temperature plasma physics and chemistry benchmark, the CDM achieves higher parameter and data efficiency than physics-consistent baselines. Crucially, we demonstrate that the denoising objective acts as a powerful implicit regularizer: despite never seeing the governing equations during training, the model adheres to physical constraints more strictly than baselines trained with explicit physics losses.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.
Builds on
25 of 43 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,761
- 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,045
- 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,305
- 2021Variational Diffusion Modelscited by 1,153
- 2021Solving Inverse Problems in Medical Imaging with Score-Based Generative Modelscited by 521
- 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 405
13 more
- 2022PhysDiff: Physics-Guided Human Motion Diffusion Modelcited by 368
- 2020Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networkscited by 135
- 2020Learning Energy-Based Models by Diffusion Recovery Likelihoodcited by 123
- 2013Generalized Denoising Auto-Encoders as Generative Modelscited by 113
- 2023CoCoGen: Physically-Consistent and Conditioned Score-based Generative Models for Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 56
- 2025Equilibrium Matching: Generative Modeling with Implicit Energy-Based Modelscited by 21
- 2025Diffusion Models for Molecules: A Survey of Methods and Taskscited by 19
- 2023Score dynamics: scaling molecular dynamics with picoseconds timestep via conditional diffusion modelcited by 16
- 2023Training Energy-Based Models with Diffusion Contrastive Divergencescited by 9
- 2024Random Walks with Tweedie: A Unified View of Score-Based Diffusion Modelscited by 6
- 2025Physics-consistent machine learning: output projection onto physical manifoldscited by 6
- 2024A Score-based Generative Solver for PDE-constrained Inverse Problems with Complex Priorscited by 3
- 2025Integration Matters for Learning PDEs with Backward SDEscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.