P2S: Probabilistic Process Supervision for General-Domain Reasoning Question Answering
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
While reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has advanced LLM reasoning in structured domains like mathematics and programming, its application to general-domain reasoning tasks remains challenging due to the absence of verifiable reward signals. To this end, methods like Reinforcement Learning with Reference Probability Reward (RLPR) have emerged, leveraging the probability of generating the final answer as a reward signal. However, these outcome-focused approaches neglect crucial step-by-step supervision of the reasoning process itself. To address this gap, we introduce Probabilistic Process Supervision (P2S), a novel self-supervision framework that provides fine-grained process rewards without requiring a separate reward model or human-annotated reasoning steps. During reinforcement learning, P2S synthesizes and filters a high-quality reference reasoning chain (gold-CoT). The core of our method is to calculate a Path Faithfulness Reward (PFR) for each reasoning step, which is derived from the conditional probability of generating the gold-CoT's suffix, given the model's current reasoning prefix. Crucially, this PFR can be flexibly integrated with any outcome-based reward, directly tackling the reward sparsity problem by providing dense guidance. Extensive experiments on reading comprehension and medical Question Answering benchmarks show that P2S significantly outperforms strong baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.
Builds on
27 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 15
Same direction, newest first
- 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers23 Jun
- 2025Direct Reasoning Optimization: Token-Level Reasoning Reflectivity Meets Rubric Gates for Unverifiable Tasks16 Jun
- 2025Segment Policy Optimization: Effective Segment-Level Credit Assignment in RL for Large Language Models29 May
- 2025Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifiers27 May
- 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains20 May
- 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model31 Mar
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild24 Mar
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
- 2025Logic-RL: Unleashing LLM Reasoning with Rule-Based Reinforcement Learning20 Feb
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
- 2024PSPO*: An Effective Process-supervised Policy Optimization for Reasoning Alignment18 Nov
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning10 Oct
3 more
Other references · 12
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
- 2024Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learningcited by 405
- 2024HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMscited by 257
- 2025Light-R1: Curriculum SFT, DPO and RL for Long COT from Scratch and Beyondcited by 175
- 2025Skywork Open Reasoner 1 Technical Reportcited by 161
- 2024Generative Reward Modelscited by 148
- 2025GHPO: Adaptive Guidance for Stable and Efficient LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
- 2025Copyright Protection for Large Language Models: A Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Trendscited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Rewarding Better Thinking for LLM Preference Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Rewarding Better Thinking for LLM Preference Alignment22 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026LLM Reasoning with Process Rewards for Outcome-Guided Steps
- 2026Reward Granularity in RLVR: Comparing Process and Outcome Reward Structures for Mathematical Reasoning in Small Language Models
- 2026Verifiable Process Rewards for Agentic Reasoning
- 2025Beyond Correctness: Harmonizing Process and Outcome Rewards through RL Training
- 2026Beyond Outcome Verification: Verifiable Process Reward Models for Structured Reasoning
- 2026Learning Process Rewards via Reasoning State Propagation
- 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning
- 2025A Survey of Process Reward Models: From Outcome Signals to Process Supervisions for Large Language Models