mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Computational Complexity of Performative Prediction

arXiv 2601.20180 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Performative prediction captures the phenomenon where deploying a predictive model shifts the underlying data distribution. While simple retraining dynamics are known to converge linearly when the performative effects are weak (ρ < 1), the complexity in the regime ρ > 1 was hitherto open. In this paper, we establish a sharp phase transition: computing an ε-performatively stable point is PPAD-complete -- and thus polynomial-time equivalent to Nash equilibria in general-sum games -- even when ρ = 1 + O(ε). This intractability persists even in the ostensibly simple setting with a quadratic loss function and linear distribution shifts. One of our key technical contributions is to extend this PPAD-hardness result to general convex domains, which is of broader interest in the complexity of variational inequalities. Finally, we address the special case of strategic classification, showing that computing a strategic local optimum is PLS-hard.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.

Builds on

31 of 56 references.

References · 31

  1. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  2. 2020Performative Predictioncited by 318
  3. 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 256
  4. 2017Strategic Classification from Revealed Preferencescited by 126
  5. 2021Outside the Echo Chamber: Optimizing the Performative Riskcited by 95
  6. 2021How to Learn when Data Reacts to Your Model: Performative Gradient Descentcited by 70
  7. 2020Stochastic optimization with decision-dependent distributionscited by 65
  8. 2020Halpern Iteration for Near-Optimal and Parameter-Free Monotone Inclusion and Strong Solutions to Variational Inequalitiescited by 60
  9. 2021Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?cited by 53
  10. 2023Performative Prediction: Past and Futurecited by 52
  11. 2022Multiplayer Performative Prediction: Learning in Decision-Dependent Gamescited by 42
  12. 2022Multi-agent Performative Prediction: From Global Stability and Optimality to Chaoscited by 33
19 more
  1. 2023Performative Prediction with Neural Networkscited by 33
  2. 2018Strategyproof Linear Regression in High Dimensionscited by 22
  3. 2020The Complexity of Gradient Descent: CLS = PPAD cap PLScited by 17
  4. 2014Inapproximability of Nash Equilibriumcited by 14
  5. 2024Stochastic Optimization Schemes for Performative Prediction with Nonconvex Losscited by 12
  6. 2020Incentivizing Truthfulness Through Audits in Strategic Classificationcited by 8
  7. 2024Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Designcited by 7
  8. 2024Distributionally Robust Performative Predictioncited by 7
  9. 2022Pure-Circuit: Tight Inapproximability for PPADcited by 5
  10. 2024Improved Hardness Results for Min-Max Optimization with Coupled Constraintscited by 5
  11. 2025Expected Variational Inequalitiescited by 5
  12. 2025Pushing the Complexity Boundaries of Fixed-Point Equations: Adaptation to Contraction and Controlled Expansioncited by 5
  13. 2024Tight Lower Bounds and Improved Convergence in Performative Predictioncited by 4
  14. 2019Tarski's Theorem, Supermodular Games, and the Complexity of Equilibriacited by 3
  15. 2014Constant Rank Bimatrix Games are PPAD-hardcited by 2
  16. 2020Tree Polymatrix Games are PPAD-hardcited by 2
  17. 2022Tight Inapproximability for Graphical Gamescited by 2
  18. 2024On the Hypomonotone Class of Variational Inequalitiescited by 1
  19. 2025Fixed Point Computation: Beating Brute Force with Smoothed Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.