IMRNNs: An Efficient Method for Interpretable Dense Retrieval via Embedding Modulation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Generation and context integration
Abstract (arXiv)
Interpretability in black-box dense retrievers remains a central challenge in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Understanding how queries and documents semantically interact is critical for diagnosing retrieval behavior and improving model design. However, existing dense retrievers rely on static embeddings for both queries and documents, which obscures this bidirectional relationship. Post-hoc approaches such as re-rankers are computationally expensive, add inference latency, and still fail to reveal the underlying semantic alignment. To address these limitations, we propose Interpretable Modular Retrieval Neural Networks (IMRNNs), a lightweight framework that augments any dense retriever with dynamic, bidirectional modulation at inference time. IMRNNs employ two independent adapters: one conditions document embeddings on the current query, while the other refines the query embedding using corpus-level feedback from initially retrieved documents. This iterative modulation process enables the model to adapt representations dynamically and expose interpretable semantic dependencies between queries and documents. Empirically, IMRNNs not only enhance interpretability but also improve retrieval effectiveness. Across seven benchmark datasets, applying our method to standard dense retrievers yields average gains of +6.35% nDCG, +7.14% recall, and +7.04% MRR over state-of-the-art baselines. These results demonstrate that incorporating interpretability-driven modulation can both explain and enhance retrieval in RAG systems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Generation and context integration, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2026.
Builds on
25 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024NUDGE: Lightweight Non-Parametric Fine-Tuning of Embeddings for Retrieval4 Sep
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks22 May
Other references · 23
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
- 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
- 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 333
- 2021SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Rankingcited by 286
- 2022Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examplescited by 235
- 2024Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Toolscited by 176
- 2022Task-aware Retrieval with Instructionscited by 107
- 2021Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?cited by 98
11 more
- 2024Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Surveycited by 83
- 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Surveycited by 81
- 2021SelfExplain: A Self-Explaining Architecture for Neural Text Classifierscited by 44
- 2024On Behalf of the Stakeholders: Trends in NLP Model Interpretability in the Era of LLMscited by 25
- 2021More Robust Dense Retrieval with Contrastive Dual Learningcited by 15
- 2023Search-Adaptor: Embedding Customization for Information Retrievalcited by 11
- 2024Interpret and Control Dense Retrieval with Sparse Latent Featurescited by 10
- 2025Optimizing Retrieval Strategies for Financial Question Answering Documents in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 9
- 2020CrossCheck: Rapid, Reproducible, and Interpretable Model Evaluationcited by 7
- 2023Explain like I am BM25: Interpreting a Dense Model's Ranked-List with a Sparse Approximationcited by 5
- 2022Locally Aggregated Feature Attribution on Natural Language Model Understandingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Compact Geometric Representations of Hierarchies16 Jun 2026
- 2026Xetrieval: Mechanistically Explaining Dense Retrieval28 May 2026
- 2026flexvec: SQL Vector Retrieval with Programmatic Embedding Modulation23 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Decoding Dense Embeddings: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting and Discretizing Dense Retrieval
- 2026Neurosymbolic Retrievers for Retrieval-augmented Generation
- 2026Embedding Surgery: Localized Updates for Adaptive Ranking Correction in Dense Retrieval
- 2022LED: Lexicon-Enlightened Dense Retriever for Large-Scale Retrieval
- 2025Rethinking Hybrid Retrieval: When Small Embeddings and LLM Re-ranking Beat Bigger Models
- 2025Learning Refined Document Representations for Dense Retrieval via Deliberate Thinking
- 2025ELITE: Embedding-Less retrieval with Iterative Text Exploration
- 2024Dense Passage Retrieval: Is it Retrieving?