mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CrossCheck: Rapid, Reproducible, and Interpretable Model Evaluation

arXiv 2004.07993 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2020cs.HCcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluation beyond aggregate performance metrics, e.g. F1-score, is crucial to both establish an appropriate level of trust in machine learning models and identify future model improvements. In this paper we demonstrate CrossCheck, an interactive visualization tool for rapid crossmodel comparison and reproducible error analysis. We describe the tool and discuss design and implementation details. We then present three use cases (named entity recognition, reading comprehension, and clickbait detection) that show the benefits of using the tool for model evaluation. CrossCheck allows data scientists to make informed decisions to choose between multiple models, identify when the models are correct and for which examples, investigate whether the models are making the same mistakes as humans, evaluate models' generalizability and highlight models' limitations, strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, CrossCheck is implemented as a Jupyter widget, which allows rapid and convenient integration into data scientists' model development workflows.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.